赞扬比较宪法:来自联邦的教训

The Denning Law Journal Pub Date : 2019-08-08 DOI:10.5750/DLJ.V30I2.1696

J. Hatchard, J. Scutt

{"title":"赞扬比较宪法:来自联邦的教训","authors":"J. Hatchard, J. Scutt","doi":"10.5750/DLJ.V30I2.1696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constitutions come in all shapes and sizes. Some provide for a federal or confederal structure whilst others adopt a unitary model. Internal ethnic, religious or other factors may determine the structure and distribution of constitutional powers, issues that are often of less significance in a constitution written for a more homogenous population","PeriodicalId":382436,"journal":{"name":"The Denning Law Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IN PRAISE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: LESSONS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH\",\"authors\":\"J. Hatchard, J. Scutt\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/DLJ.V30I2.1696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Constitutions come in all shapes and sizes. Some provide for a federal or confederal structure whilst others adopt a unitary model. Internal ethnic, religious or other factors may determine the structure and distribution of constitutional powers, issues that are often of less significance in a constitution written for a more homogenous population\",\"PeriodicalId\":382436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Denning Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Denning Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V30I2.1696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Denning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V30I2.1696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

宪法有各种形式和大小。一些提供联邦或邦联结构，而另一些采用单一模式。内部的种族、宗教或其他因素可能决定宪法权力的结构和分配，这些问题在为更同质的人口编写的宪法中往往不那么重要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

IN PRAISE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: LESSONS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH

Constitutions come in all shapes and sizes. Some provide for a federal or confederal structure whilst others adopt a unitary model. Internal ethnic, religious or other factors may determine the structure and distribution of constitutional powers, issues that are often of less significance in a constitution written for a more homogenous population

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Denning Law Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量