欧洲大学治理:管理趋同还是政治协调?

Thierry Côme, Petia G. Gueorguieva, Radovan Gura, Gilles Rouet
{"title":"欧洲大学治理:管理趋同还是政治协调?","authors":"Thierry Côme, Petia G. Gueorguieva, Radovan Gura, Gilles Rouet","doi":"10.2478/joim-2018-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: This contribution attempts to highlight the convergences and divergences of the strategies and modes of governance put in place in the current context of European universities (knowledge economy, budget restrictions, changing demand of students and employers). Methodology: A study of three universities from three different countries, two public and one private, is proposed from the analysis of the internal official documents (strategic projects) of the structures and interviews with the leaders. Findings: Elements of convergences and divergences are highlighted, which makes it possible to make hypotheses to verify in other researches. Value Added: The approach is exploratory and complementary to the analyses in terms of the structure and strategy model of higher education institutions Recommendations: The implementation of the Bologna Process is still often instrumentalized or rejected (defence of local specificities or fears of excessive standardization), but the current evolution of constraints and environments seems to go far beyond this non-normative project. It should therefore be considered as an opportunity for a positive and effective response to the present stakes.","PeriodicalId":302686,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercultural Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University Governance in Europe: Managerial Convergences or Political Harmonization?\",\"authors\":\"Thierry Côme, Petia G. Gueorguieva, Radovan Gura, Gilles Rouet\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/joim-2018-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: This contribution attempts to highlight the convergences and divergences of the strategies and modes of governance put in place in the current context of European universities (knowledge economy, budget restrictions, changing demand of students and employers). Methodology: A study of three universities from three different countries, two public and one private, is proposed from the analysis of the internal official documents (strategic projects) of the structures and interviews with the leaders. Findings: Elements of convergences and divergences are highlighted, which makes it possible to make hypotheses to verify in other researches. Value Added: The approach is exploratory and complementary to the analyses in terms of the structure and strategy model of higher education institutions Recommendations: The implementation of the Bologna Process is still often instrumentalized or rejected (defence of local specificities or fears of excessive standardization), but the current evolution of constraints and environments seems to go far beyond this non-normative project. It should therefore be considered as an opportunity for a positive and effective response to the present stakes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intercultural Management\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intercultural Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2018-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercultural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2018-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要目的:本文试图突出当前欧洲大学(知识经济、预算限制、学生和雇主不断变化的需求)背景下治理策略和模式的趋同与分歧。研究方法:对来自三个不同国家的三所大学进行研究,两所公立大学和一所私立大学,从结构的内部官方文件(战略项目)分析和对领导人的采访中提出。研究发现:突出了趋同和发散的要素,从而为其他研究提出假设进行验证提供了可能。附加值:该方法是对高等教育机构结构和战略模型分析的探索性和补充。建议:博洛尼亚进程的实施仍然经常被工具化或拒绝(捍卫地方特殊性或担心过度标准化),但目前的约束和环境的演变似乎远远超出了这个非规范性项目。因此,应将其视为对目前的利害关系作出积极和有效反应的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
University Governance in Europe: Managerial Convergences or Political Harmonization?
Abstract Objective: This contribution attempts to highlight the convergences and divergences of the strategies and modes of governance put in place in the current context of European universities (knowledge economy, budget restrictions, changing demand of students and employers). Methodology: A study of three universities from three different countries, two public and one private, is proposed from the analysis of the internal official documents (strategic projects) of the structures and interviews with the leaders. Findings: Elements of convergences and divergences are highlighted, which makes it possible to make hypotheses to verify in other researches. Value Added: The approach is exploratory and complementary to the analyses in terms of the structure and strategy model of higher education institutions Recommendations: The implementation of the Bologna Process is still often instrumentalized or rejected (defence of local specificities or fears of excessive standardization), but the current evolution of constraints and environments seems to go far beyond this non-normative project. It should therefore be considered as an opportunity for a positive and effective response to the present stakes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信