图像拼接算法的性能和鲁棒性的定量和定性评价

Vipula Dissanayake, Sachini Herath, Sanka Rasnayaka, Sachith Seneviratne, Rajith Vidanaarachchi, C. Gamage
{"title":"图像拼接算法的性能和鲁棒性的定量和定性评价","authors":"Vipula Dissanayake, Sachini Herath, Sanka Rasnayaka, Sachith Seneviratne, Rajith Vidanaarachchi, C. Gamage","doi":"10.1109/DICTA.2015.7371297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many different image stitching algorithms, and mechanisms to assess their quality have been proposed by different research groups in the past decade. However, a comparison across different stitching algorithms and evaluation mechanisms has not been performed before. Our objective is to recognize the best algorithm for panoramic image stitching. We measure the robustness of different algorithms by means of assessing image quality of a set of panoramas. For the evaluation itself a varied set of assessment criteria are used, and the evaluation is performed over a large range of images captured using differing cameras. In an ideal stitching algorithm, the resulting stitched image should be without visible seams and other noticeable anomalies. An objective evaluation for image quality should give results corresponding to a similar evaluation by the Human Visual System. Our conclusion is that the choice of stitching algorithm is scenario dependent, with run-time and accuracy being the primary considerations.","PeriodicalId":214897,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Performance and Robustness of Image Stitching Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Vipula Dissanayake, Sachini Herath, Sanka Rasnayaka, Sachith Seneviratne, Rajith Vidanaarachchi, C. Gamage\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DICTA.2015.7371297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many different image stitching algorithms, and mechanisms to assess their quality have been proposed by different research groups in the past decade. However, a comparison across different stitching algorithms and evaluation mechanisms has not been performed before. Our objective is to recognize the best algorithm for panoramic image stitching. We measure the robustness of different algorithms by means of assessing image quality of a set of panoramas. For the evaluation itself a varied set of assessment criteria are used, and the evaluation is performed over a large range of images captured using differing cameras. In an ideal stitching algorithm, the resulting stitched image should be without visible seams and other noticeable anomalies. An objective evaluation for image quality should give results corresponding to a similar evaluation by the Human Visual System. Our conclusion is that the choice of stitching algorithm is scenario dependent, with run-time and accuracy being the primary considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2015.7371297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2015.7371297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在过去的十年中,不同的研究小组提出了许多不同的图像拼接算法和评估其质量的机制。然而,在不同的拼接算法和评估机制之间进行比较之前没有进行过。我们的目标是识别全景图像拼接的最佳算法。我们通过评估一组全景图的图像质量来衡量不同算法的鲁棒性。对于评估本身,使用了一组不同的评估标准,并且在使用不同相机捕获的大范围图像上进行评估。在理想的拼接算法中,拼接后的图像应该没有可见的接缝和其他明显的异常。对图像质量的客观评价应该给出与人类视觉系统类似的评价相对应的结果。我们的结论是,拼接算法的选择取决于场景,运行时间和精度是主要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Performance and Robustness of Image Stitching Algorithms
Many different image stitching algorithms, and mechanisms to assess their quality have been proposed by different research groups in the past decade. However, a comparison across different stitching algorithms and evaluation mechanisms has not been performed before. Our objective is to recognize the best algorithm for panoramic image stitching. We measure the robustness of different algorithms by means of assessing image quality of a set of panoramas. For the evaluation itself a varied set of assessment criteria are used, and the evaluation is performed over a large range of images captured using differing cameras. In an ideal stitching algorithm, the resulting stitched image should be without visible seams and other noticeable anomalies. An objective evaluation for image quality should give results corresponding to a similar evaluation by the Human Visual System. Our conclusion is that the choice of stitching algorithm is scenario dependent, with run-time and accuracy being the primary considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信