{"title":"盖的合理性检验:假设检验的可计算性","authors":"Amir Leshem","doi":"10.1109/EEEI.2006.321057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we discuss computability aspects of hypothesis testing. We describe two main results. First we determine the type of sets that admit a weak decision procedure. Surprisingly some non-computable sets admit a computable weak decision procedure. This strengthens results of Cover and Putnam. We then apply the notion of weak decision procedure to the testing of the physical Church-Turing thesis. While our first theorem states that there are non-computable sets that admit weak decision procedures, we are able to show that no weak decision procedure can help us to decide that a physical device is capable of computing non Turing computable functions or that a physical constant encodes the bits of a non-computable real. This has strong implications on the validity of physical theories entailing the failure of the physical Church-Turing thesis.","PeriodicalId":142814,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE 24th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cover's test of rationality revisited: Computability aspects of hypothesis testing\",\"authors\":\"Amir Leshem\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEEI.2006.321057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we discuss computability aspects of hypothesis testing. We describe two main results. First we determine the type of sets that admit a weak decision procedure. Surprisingly some non-computable sets admit a computable weak decision procedure. This strengthens results of Cover and Putnam. We then apply the notion of weak decision procedure to the testing of the physical Church-Turing thesis. While our first theorem states that there are non-computable sets that admit weak decision procedures, we are able to show that no weak decision procedure can help us to decide that a physical device is capable of computing non Turing computable functions or that a physical constant encodes the bits of a non-computable real. This has strong implications on the validity of physical theories entailing the failure of the physical Church-Turing thesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE 24th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE 24th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEI.2006.321057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE 24th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEI.2006.321057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cover's test of rationality revisited: Computability aspects of hypothesis testing
In this paper we discuss computability aspects of hypothesis testing. We describe two main results. First we determine the type of sets that admit a weak decision procedure. Surprisingly some non-computable sets admit a computable weak decision procedure. This strengthens results of Cover and Putnam. We then apply the notion of weak decision procedure to the testing of the physical Church-Turing thesis. While our first theorem states that there are non-computable sets that admit weak decision procedures, we are able to show that no weak decision procedure can help us to decide that a physical device is capable of computing non Turing computable functions or that a physical constant encodes the bits of a non-computable real. This has strong implications on the validity of physical theories entailing the failure of the physical Church-Turing thesis.