codmans与maitland方案治疗肩周炎的疗效比较

Karthikeyan, P. Sing, Moorthy
{"title":"codmans与maitland方案治疗肩周炎的疗效比较","authors":"Karthikeyan, P. Sing, Moorthy","doi":"10.53555/eijmhs.v4i2.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frozen shoulder syndrome is a commonly encountered clinical complaint. It is encountered by clinicians (General Practitioners (GP’s), Rheumatologists, Orthopedic surgeons) and physical therapists (Physiotherapy, Osteopathy, Chiropractic).Shoulder joint is one of the most rewarding and functional joints involved in daily routines including performances, occupational and recreational activities. \nAim to Compare the Therapeutic efficacy of codmans and Maitland regime for the treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome \nMethods Each group consists of fifteen patients and they were equally divided into two groups such as Group A and B. The group include both male and female with the age group of 30-55 years. One group of patients treated with conventional Shoulder exercise regime and other group treated with Maitland manipulation. \nStudy Design Comparative study with pretest and post –test design \nResults Group A patients which shows significantly 1.46(P0.05) pain reduction. Group B patients which shows significantly 1.40(P0.05).Finally both the groups shows the pain reduction \nClinical Implications The notion of the current study which provides evidence that Conventional Shoulder exercises and Maitland mobilization were equally effective for the management of pain in frozen shoulder. \nBoth manual mobilization therapy along with general exercises and exercises alone brought improvements in outcome measure scales for pain, glenohumeral ranges and shoulder pain.","PeriodicalId":122699,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Medical and Health Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF CODMANS VERSUS MAITLAND REGIME FOR THE TREATMENT OF FROZEN SHOULDER SYNDROME\",\"authors\":\"Karthikeyan, P. Sing, Moorthy\",\"doi\":\"10.53555/eijmhs.v4i2.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Frozen shoulder syndrome is a commonly encountered clinical complaint. It is encountered by clinicians (General Practitioners (GP’s), Rheumatologists, Orthopedic surgeons) and physical therapists (Physiotherapy, Osteopathy, Chiropractic).Shoulder joint is one of the most rewarding and functional joints involved in daily routines including performances, occupational and recreational activities. \\nAim to Compare the Therapeutic efficacy of codmans and Maitland regime for the treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome \\nMethods Each group consists of fifteen patients and they were equally divided into two groups such as Group A and B. The group include both male and female with the age group of 30-55 years. One group of patients treated with conventional Shoulder exercise regime and other group treated with Maitland manipulation. \\nStudy Design Comparative study with pretest and post –test design \\nResults Group A patients which shows significantly 1.46(P0.05) pain reduction. Group B patients which shows significantly 1.40(P0.05).Finally both the groups shows the pain reduction \\nClinical Implications The notion of the current study which provides evidence that Conventional Shoulder exercises and Maitland mobilization were equally effective for the management of pain in frozen shoulder. \\nBoth manual mobilization therapy along with general exercises and exercises alone brought improvements in outcome measure scales for pain, glenohumeral ranges and shoulder pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPH - International Journal of Medical and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPH - International Journal of Medical and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v4i2.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Medical and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v4i2.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肩周炎是一种常见的临床疾病。临床医生(全科医生,风湿病学家,骨科医生)和物理治疗师(物理疗法,整骨疗法,脊椎疗法)都会遇到这种情况。肩关节是日常生活中最有价值和功能的关节之一,包括表演,职业和娱乐活动。目的比较codmans方案和Maitland方案治疗肩周炎的疗效。方法每组15例患者平均分为A组和b组,男女均有,年龄30 ~ 55岁。一组患者采用常规肩部运动方案,另一组采用Maitland手法治疗。研究设计与测试前和测试后设计的比较研究结果A组患者疼痛明显减轻1.46(P总分0.05)。B组为1.40,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。最后,两组都显示了减轻疼痛的临床意义。当前研究的概念提供了证据,证明传统的肩部运动和Maitland活动对治疗冻疮肩部疼痛同样有效。手工活动疗法与一般锻炼和单独锻炼都能改善疼痛、肩关节范围和肩部疼痛的结果测量量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF CODMANS VERSUS MAITLAND REGIME FOR THE TREATMENT OF FROZEN SHOULDER SYNDROME
Frozen shoulder syndrome is a commonly encountered clinical complaint. It is encountered by clinicians (General Practitioners (GP’s), Rheumatologists, Orthopedic surgeons) and physical therapists (Physiotherapy, Osteopathy, Chiropractic).Shoulder joint is one of the most rewarding and functional joints involved in daily routines including performances, occupational and recreational activities. Aim to Compare the Therapeutic efficacy of codmans and Maitland regime for the treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome Methods Each group consists of fifteen patients and they were equally divided into two groups such as Group A and B. The group include both male and female with the age group of 30-55 years. One group of patients treated with conventional Shoulder exercise regime and other group treated with Maitland manipulation. Study Design Comparative study with pretest and post –test design Results Group A patients which shows significantly 1.46(P0.05) pain reduction. Group B patients which shows significantly 1.40(P0.05).Finally both the groups shows the pain reduction Clinical Implications The notion of the current study which provides evidence that Conventional Shoulder exercises and Maitland mobilization were equally effective for the management of pain in frozen shoulder. Both manual mobilization therapy along with general exercises and exercises alone brought improvements in outcome measure scales for pain, glenohumeral ranges and shoulder pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信