现代色情的使用与滥用:作为审美、禁欲、麻醉的色情

Ben Muratovic
{"title":"现代色情的使用与滥用:作为审美、禁欲、麻醉的色情","authors":"Ben Muratovic","doi":"10.33182/agon.v17i1.3017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How should we evaluate the modern day use and abuse of pornography? Modern day video pornography has the hallmarks of film and cinema industry (lights, cameras, sets, actors, etc), but common sentiment is that it doesn’t deserve the status of being called \"Art\". An exploitative media that gets a bad review may get labeled as “trauma” or “torture porn.”  Calling something pornographic indicates that the creators of a media had poor taste. In the section titled “On the Sublime ones” of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Z II), [1] Nietzsche states “But all life is disputing of taste and tasting!”  Nietzsche concerns over taste are directly related to his effort to maximize the role of aesthetic judgments in all parts of life. As the early Nietzsche states in the Birth of Tragedy (BT §5) “…the existence of the world is justified only as an aesthetic phenomenon.” [2]\nA Nietzschean investigation into the purpose of modern pornography requires a perspectivist and not a moral assessment. Kant’s Critique of Judgement reflected on the topics of both aesthetics and teleology, suggesting the question of aesthetics must include a concern over purposiveness. Thus, what is the purpose of pornography? How does it juxtapose to the actual act of sex itself? To Erotic art? Is it akin to the violent Ancient Greek Doric Frieze? Lastly, in a civilization where pornography is of easy access to all, does this take away the prevalence of sex itself? This paper attempts a Nietzschean investigation on the subject and will touch on the themes of gender, domination, sublimation, and the consumption of media.\n \n\n","PeriodicalId":280178,"journal":{"name":"The Agonist","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uses and Abuses of Modern Pornography: Pornography as Aesthetic, Ascetic, Anesthetic\",\"authors\":\"Ben Muratovic\",\"doi\":\"10.33182/agon.v17i1.3017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How should we evaluate the modern day use and abuse of pornography? Modern day video pornography has the hallmarks of film and cinema industry (lights, cameras, sets, actors, etc), but common sentiment is that it doesn’t deserve the status of being called \\\"Art\\\". An exploitative media that gets a bad review may get labeled as “trauma” or “torture porn.”  Calling something pornographic indicates that the creators of a media had poor taste. In the section titled “On the Sublime ones” of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Z II), [1] Nietzsche states “But all life is disputing of taste and tasting!”  Nietzsche concerns over taste are directly related to his effort to maximize the role of aesthetic judgments in all parts of life. As the early Nietzsche states in the Birth of Tragedy (BT §5) “…the existence of the world is justified only as an aesthetic phenomenon.” [2]\\nA Nietzschean investigation into the purpose of modern pornography requires a perspectivist and not a moral assessment. Kant’s Critique of Judgement reflected on the topics of both aesthetics and teleology, suggesting the question of aesthetics must include a concern over purposiveness. Thus, what is the purpose of pornography? How does it juxtapose to the actual act of sex itself? To Erotic art? Is it akin to the violent Ancient Greek Doric Frieze? Lastly, in a civilization where pornography is of easy access to all, does this take away the prevalence of sex itself? This paper attempts a Nietzschean investigation on the subject and will touch on the themes of gender, domination, sublimation, and the consumption of media.\\n \\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":280178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Agonist\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Agonist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33182/agon.v17i1.3017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Agonist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33182/agon.v17i1.3017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们应该如何评价现代对色情的使用和滥用?现代视频色情具有电影和电影工业的特征(灯光,摄像机,布景,演员等),但普遍的看法是,它不配被称为“艺术”的地位。获得差评的剥削性媒体可能会被贴上“创伤”或“酷刑色情”的标签。称某物为色情表明媒体的创造者品味低下。在《查拉图斯特拉如是说》(Z II)的“论崇高者”一节中,[1]尼采说:“但所有的生活都是品味和品味的争论!”尼采对品味的关注与他努力最大化审美判断在生活各方面的作用直接相关。正如早期尼采在《悲剧的诞生》(BT§5)中所说:“……世界的存在只有作为一种美学现象才被证明是合理的。”[2]对现代色情的目的进行尼采式的调查需要一种透视主义,而不是一种道德评估。康德的《判断力批判》同时反映了美学和目的论的主题,表明美学问题必须包括对合意性的关注。那么,色情的目的是什么呢?它如何与性本身的实际行为并列?色情艺术?它是否类似于暴力的古希腊多立克弗里兹?最后,在一个所有人都能轻易接触到色情作品的文明中,这是否能消除性本身的普遍性?本文试图对这一主题进行尼采式的研究,并将触及性别、统治、升华和媒体消费等主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uses and Abuses of Modern Pornography: Pornography as Aesthetic, Ascetic, Anesthetic
How should we evaluate the modern day use and abuse of pornography? Modern day video pornography has the hallmarks of film and cinema industry (lights, cameras, sets, actors, etc), but common sentiment is that it doesn’t deserve the status of being called "Art". An exploitative media that gets a bad review may get labeled as “trauma” or “torture porn.”  Calling something pornographic indicates that the creators of a media had poor taste. In the section titled “On the Sublime ones” of Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Z II), [1] Nietzsche states “But all life is disputing of taste and tasting!”  Nietzsche concerns over taste are directly related to his effort to maximize the role of aesthetic judgments in all parts of life. As the early Nietzsche states in the Birth of Tragedy (BT §5) “…the existence of the world is justified only as an aesthetic phenomenon.” [2] A Nietzschean investigation into the purpose of modern pornography requires a perspectivist and not a moral assessment. Kant’s Critique of Judgement reflected on the topics of both aesthetics and teleology, suggesting the question of aesthetics must include a concern over purposiveness. Thus, what is the purpose of pornography? How does it juxtapose to the actual act of sex itself? To Erotic art? Is it akin to the violent Ancient Greek Doric Frieze? Lastly, in a civilization where pornography is of easy access to all, does this take away the prevalence of sex itself? This paper attempts a Nietzschean investigation on the subject and will touch on the themes of gender, domination, sublimation, and the consumption of media.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信