底栖大型无脊椎动物样本分类技术人员的差异

W. Ettinger
{"title":"底栖大型无脊椎动物样本分类技术人员的差异","authors":"W. Ettinger","doi":"10.2307/1467189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After identification and enumeration, specimens sorted from 18 benthic macroinvertebrate samples by two technicians were returned to corresponding sample residue. Unknown to technicians, the samples were remixed and relabeled with new collection dates and then sorted as if newly collected. By chance, 13 samples were sorted by both technicians. A two-tailed t-test (p≤0.05) indicated significant difference in number of sorted specimens, but no difference in sorting time and in number of sorted genera.","PeriodicalId":154110,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Invertebrate Biology","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation between Technicians Sorting Benthic Macroinvertebrate Samples\",\"authors\":\"W. Ettinger\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1467189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After identification and enumeration, specimens sorted from 18 benthic macroinvertebrate samples by two technicians were returned to corresponding sample residue. Unknown to technicians, the samples were remixed and relabeled with new collection dates and then sorted as if newly collected. By chance, 13 samples were sorted by both technicians. A two-tailed t-test (p≤0.05) indicated significant difference in number of sorted specimens, but no difference in sorting time and in number of sorted genera.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Freshwater Invertebrate Biology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Freshwater Invertebrate Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1467189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Freshwater Invertebrate Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1467189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由两名技术人员从18个底栖大型无脊椎动物样本中分选出的标本经过鉴定和计数后,返回到相应的样本残库中。在技术人员不知情的情况下,这些样品被重新混合,并重新贴上新的收集日期的标签,然后像新收集的一样进行分类。巧合的是,两名技术人员分出了13个样品。经双尾t检验(p≤0.05),分选标本数量差异有统计学意义,分选时间和分选属数差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation between Technicians Sorting Benthic Macroinvertebrate Samples
After identification and enumeration, specimens sorted from 18 benthic macroinvertebrate samples by two technicians were returned to corresponding sample residue. Unknown to technicians, the samples were remixed and relabeled with new collection dates and then sorted as if newly collected. By chance, 13 samples were sorted by both technicians. A two-tailed t-test (p≤0.05) indicated significant difference in number of sorted specimens, but no difference in sorting time and in number of sorted genera.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信