荷兰和德国社会租赁的路径

M. Haffner, S. Tsenkova
{"title":"荷兰和德国社会租赁的路径","authors":"M. Haffner, S. Tsenkova","doi":"10.4324/9781003172949-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pathways that Dutch and German housing policies took in the past decades resulted in two different rental markets. The Dutch policies have delivered the largest social rental sector in the Western world, while Germany has produced one of the largest private rental sectors in Europe. The latter implies that officially no social rental sector is operating in Germany, but a private rental sector of which some suppliers of housing are temporarily subsidized. On the other hand, social rental dwellings in the Netherlands are owned by non-profit organizations, whose public task is to provide affordable housing for those in need. Even though the systems of social renting are different, both countries had moved from providing affordable rental housing to large segments of the population to a more targeted system and from a nationally implemented to a more locally implemented policy. In the past decade, the Netherlands has effectively been limiting the supply of social rental housing, Germany is offering extra subsidies to increase the supply of affordable housing.","PeriodicalId":254927,"journal":{"name":"Cities and Affordable Housing","volume":"596 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathways of Dutch and German Social Renting\",\"authors\":\"M. Haffner, S. Tsenkova\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003172949-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pathways that Dutch and German housing policies took in the past decades resulted in two different rental markets. The Dutch policies have delivered the largest social rental sector in the Western world, while Germany has produced one of the largest private rental sectors in Europe. The latter implies that officially no social rental sector is operating in Germany, but a private rental sector of which some suppliers of housing are temporarily subsidized. On the other hand, social rental dwellings in the Netherlands are owned by non-profit organizations, whose public task is to provide affordable housing for those in need. Even though the systems of social renting are different, both countries had moved from providing affordable rental housing to large segments of the population to a more targeted system and from a nationally implemented to a more locally implemented policy. In the past decade, the Netherlands has effectively been limiting the supply of social rental housing, Germany is offering extra subsidies to increase the supply of affordable housing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities and Affordable Housing\",\"volume\":\"596 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities and Affordable Housing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003172949-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities and Affordable Housing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003172949-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

荷兰和德国在过去几十年采取的住房政策导致了两个不同的租赁市场。荷兰的政策产生了西方世界最大的社会租赁部门,而德国则产生了欧洲最大的私人租赁部门之一。后者意味着在德国没有正式的社会租赁部门,但有一个私人租赁部门,其中一些住房供应商暂时得到补贴。另一方面,荷兰的社会租赁住宅由非营利组织所有,其公共任务是为有需要的人提供负担得起的住房。尽管社会租赁制度不同,但这两个国家已从向大部分人口提供负担得起的租赁住房转变为更有针对性的制度,并从全国执行的政策转变为更在地方执行的政策。在过去的十年里,荷兰一直在有效地限制社会租赁住房的供应,德国则提供额外的补贴,以增加经济适用房的供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathways of Dutch and German Social Renting
The pathways that Dutch and German housing policies took in the past decades resulted in two different rental markets. The Dutch policies have delivered the largest social rental sector in the Western world, while Germany has produced one of the largest private rental sectors in Europe. The latter implies that officially no social rental sector is operating in Germany, but a private rental sector of which some suppliers of housing are temporarily subsidized. On the other hand, social rental dwellings in the Netherlands are owned by non-profit organizations, whose public task is to provide affordable housing for those in need. Even though the systems of social renting are different, both countries had moved from providing affordable rental housing to large segments of the population to a more targeted system and from a nationally implemented to a more locally implemented policy. In the past decade, the Netherlands has effectively been limiting the supply of social rental housing, Germany is offering extra subsidies to increase the supply of affordable housing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信