lpwan的能源效率比较:LoRaWAN与Sigfox

Yu. I. Lykov, Anastasia Paniotova, V. Shatalova, A. Lykova
{"title":"lpwan的能源效率比较:LoRaWAN与Sigfox","authors":"Yu. I. Lykov, Anastasia Paniotova, V. Shatalova, A. Lykova","doi":"10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the energy efficiency of two radio technologies LoRaWAN and Sigfox for Internet of Things. The researched technologies are popular and quite close in terms of consumer parameters, so the user often faces the choice of which one to use for his use case. For this, a typical decision was made (use case), consisting of a sensor, MCU, and modem. Considering that, LoRaWAN originally has more advanced settings and flexible customizable parameters, within the framework of this investigation, the range of their changes was chosen as close as possible to Sigfox. In conclusion, a comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of these two technologies for various payloads and the number of messages per day was obtained, and recommendations were made for their optimization. The simulation results obtained are in good agreement with the experimental results obtained by other authors.","PeriodicalId":123008,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Problems of Infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T)","volume":"520 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Efficiency Comparison LPWANs: LoRaWAN vs Sigfox\",\"authors\":\"Yu. I. Lykov, Anastasia Paniotova, V. Shatalova, A. Lykova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article compares the energy efficiency of two radio technologies LoRaWAN and Sigfox for Internet of Things. The researched technologies are popular and quite close in terms of consumer parameters, so the user often faces the choice of which one to use for his use case. For this, a typical decision was made (use case), consisting of a sensor, MCU, and modem. Considering that, LoRaWAN originally has more advanced settings and flexible customizable parameters, within the framework of this investigation, the range of their changes was chosen as close as possible to Sigfox. In conclusion, a comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of these two technologies for various payloads and the number of messages per day was obtained, and recommendations were made for their optimization. The simulation results obtained are in good agreement with the experimental results obtained by other authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Problems of Infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T)\",\"volume\":\"520 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Problems of Infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Problems of Infocommunications. Science and Technology (PIC S&T)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICST51311.2020.9468026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文比较了物联网中LoRaWAN和Sigfox两种无线电技术的能效。所研究的技术很流行,并且在消费者参数方面非常接近,因此用户经常面临选择为其用例使用哪一种技术的问题。为此,做出了一个典型的决定(用例),由传感器、MCU和调制解调器组成。考虑到LoRaWAN原本具有更高级的设置和灵活的可定制参数,在本次调查的框架内,他们的变化范围选择尽可能接近Sigfox。综上所述,对比分析了这两种技术在不同有效载荷和每天消息数量下的能源效率,并提出了优化建议。仿真结果与其他作者的实验结果吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy Efficiency Comparison LPWANs: LoRaWAN vs Sigfox
This article compares the energy efficiency of two radio technologies LoRaWAN and Sigfox for Internet of Things. The researched technologies are popular and quite close in terms of consumer parameters, so the user often faces the choice of which one to use for his use case. For this, a typical decision was made (use case), consisting of a sensor, MCU, and modem. Considering that, LoRaWAN originally has more advanced settings and flexible customizable parameters, within the framework of this investigation, the range of their changes was chosen as close as possible to Sigfox. In conclusion, a comparative analysis of the energy efficiency of these two technologies for various payloads and the number of messages per day was obtained, and recommendations were made for their optimization. The simulation results obtained are in good agreement with the experimental results obtained by other authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信