优质教学话语

J. Lampert, Bruce Burnett, B. Comber, Angela Ferguson, Naomi Barnes
{"title":"优质教学话语","authors":"J. Lampert, Bruce Burnett, B. Comber, Angela Ferguson, Naomi Barnes","doi":"10.4324/9781315109268-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is broad agreement among scholars that quality teaching is one critical factor in student learning. We argue in this chapter however, that discussions around quality teachers and quality teaching have become so politicised that the mere mention of quality (when connected to various aspects of teaching) fuels immediate debate about definitions (what constitutes quality) and measurement (how quality can be gauged). The lack of precision about the use of the keyword quality causes confusion and it is often linked to measurable outcomes across a range of basis skills...","PeriodicalId":224835,"journal":{"name":"Resisting Educational Inequality","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality teaching discourses\",\"authors\":\"J. Lampert, Bruce Burnett, B. Comber, Angela Ferguson, Naomi Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315109268-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is broad agreement among scholars that quality teaching is one critical factor in student learning. We argue in this chapter however, that discussions around quality teachers and quality teaching have become so politicised that the mere mention of quality (when connected to various aspects of teaching) fuels immediate debate about definitions (what constitutes quality) and measurement (how quality can be gauged). The lack of precision about the use of the keyword quality causes confusion and it is often linked to measurable outcomes across a range of basis skills...\",\"PeriodicalId\":224835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resisting Educational Inequality\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resisting Educational Inequality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109268-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resisting Educational Inequality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109268-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

学者们普遍认为,优质教学是学生学习的关键因素之一。然而,我们在本章中认为,围绕优质教师和优质教学的讨论已经变得如此政治化,以至于仅仅提到质量(当与教学的各个方面联系在一起时)就会立即引发关于定义(什么构成质量)和衡量(如何衡量质量)的辩论。关键字质量的使用缺乏精确性会导致混淆,并且它通常与一系列基本技能的可衡量结果相关联……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality teaching discourses
There is broad agreement among scholars that quality teaching is one critical factor in student learning. We argue in this chapter however, that discussions around quality teachers and quality teaching have become so politicised that the mere mention of quality (when connected to various aspects of teaching) fuels immediate debate about definitions (what constitutes quality) and measurement (how quality can be gauged). The lack of precision about the use of the keyword quality causes confusion and it is often linked to measurable outcomes across a range of basis skills...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信