消息灵通的投注者在点差投注市场中的动态学习和做市

J. Birge, Yifan Feng, N. B. Keskin, Adam Schultz
{"title":"消息灵通的投注者在点差投注市场中的动态学习和做市","authors":"J. Birge, Yifan Feng, N. B. Keskin, Adam Schultz","doi":"10.1145/3328526.3329646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread betting market is a prevalent form of prediction market. In the spread betting market, participants bet on the outcome of a certain future event. The market maker quotes cutoff lines as \"prices,\" and bettors take sides on whether the event outcome exceeds the quoted spread lines. We study how the market maker should move the spread lines to maximize profit. In our model, anonymous bettors with heterogeneous strategic behavior and information levels participate in the market. The market maker has limited information on the event outcome distribution. She aims to extract information from the market's responses to her spread lines (i.e., \"learning\") while guarding against an informed bettor's strategic manipulation (i.e., \"bluff-proofing\"). In terms of effective policies to adjust the market maker's spread lines, we show that Bayesian policies (BPs) that ignore bluffing are typically vulnerable to the informed bettor's strategic manipulation. To be more precise, the regret for the market maker is linear in the number of bets, and we identify certain strategies of the informed bettor that are profitable. We also show that the poor performance of BPs in our setting is not due to incomplete learning: when the informed bettor is absent in our setting, many simple policies eventually learn the event outcome distribution and achieve a bounded regret. Full Paper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3283392","PeriodicalId":416173,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Learning and Market Making in Spread Betting Markets with Informed Bettors\",\"authors\":\"J. Birge, Yifan Feng, N. B. Keskin, Adam Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3328526.3329646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The spread betting market is a prevalent form of prediction market. In the spread betting market, participants bet on the outcome of a certain future event. The market maker quotes cutoff lines as \\\"prices,\\\" and bettors take sides on whether the event outcome exceeds the quoted spread lines. We study how the market maker should move the spread lines to maximize profit. In our model, anonymous bettors with heterogeneous strategic behavior and information levels participate in the market. The market maker has limited information on the event outcome distribution. She aims to extract information from the market's responses to her spread lines (i.e., \\\"learning\\\") while guarding against an informed bettor's strategic manipulation (i.e., \\\"bluff-proofing\\\"). In terms of effective policies to adjust the market maker's spread lines, we show that Bayesian policies (BPs) that ignore bluffing are typically vulnerable to the informed bettor's strategic manipulation. To be more precise, the regret for the market maker is linear in the number of bets, and we identify certain strategies of the informed bettor that are profitable. We also show that the poor performance of BPs in our setting is not due to incomplete learning: when the informed bettor is absent in our setting, many simple policies eventually learn the event outcome distribution and achieve a bounded regret. Full Paper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3283392\",\"PeriodicalId\":416173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328526.3329646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328526.3329646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

点差交易市场是一种流行的预测市场形式。在点差交易市场中,参与者对未来某一事件的结果下注。做市商以断线作为“价格”,而押注者则根据事件结果是否超过所报价差线来选择立场。我们研究做市商应该如何移动点差线以实现利润最大化。在我们的模型中,具有异质策略行为和信息水平的匿名投注者参与市场。做市商对事件结果分布的信息有限。她的目标是从市场对她的点差线的反应中提取信息(即“学习”),同时防范知情的投注者的战略操纵(即“防虚张声势”)。在调整做市商价差线的有效政策方面,我们表明忽略虚张声势的贝叶斯政策(bp)通常容易受到知情的投注者的战略操纵。更准确地说,做市商的遗憾在投注数量上是线性的,我们确定了知情的投注者的某些盈利策略。我们还表明bp在我们的设置中表现不佳不是由于不完全学习:当我们的设置中没有知情的投注者时,许多简单的策略最终学习事件结果分布并实现有限后悔。论文全文:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3283392
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic Learning and Market Making in Spread Betting Markets with Informed Bettors
The spread betting market is a prevalent form of prediction market. In the spread betting market, participants bet on the outcome of a certain future event. The market maker quotes cutoff lines as "prices," and bettors take sides on whether the event outcome exceeds the quoted spread lines. We study how the market maker should move the spread lines to maximize profit. In our model, anonymous bettors with heterogeneous strategic behavior and information levels participate in the market. The market maker has limited information on the event outcome distribution. She aims to extract information from the market's responses to her spread lines (i.e., "learning") while guarding against an informed bettor's strategic manipulation (i.e., "bluff-proofing"). In terms of effective policies to adjust the market maker's spread lines, we show that Bayesian policies (BPs) that ignore bluffing are typically vulnerable to the informed bettor's strategic manipulation. To be more precise, the regret for the market maker is linear in the number of bets, and we identify certain strategies of the informed bettor that are profitable. We also show that the poor performance of BPs in our setting is not due to incomplete learning: when the informed bettor is absent in our setting, many simple policies eventually learn the event outcome distribution and achieve a bounded regret. Full Paper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3283392
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信