老年人验证访谈指南

Eduard C. Groen, S. Polst
{"title":"老年人验证访谈指南","authors":"Eduard C. Groen, S. Polst","doi":"10.1109/REW53955.2021.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an aging population, technology-based solutions such as Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) systems are indispensable for supporting senior citizens in retaining their independence. Senior citizens have different physical abilities, contexts of use, and attitudes towards technology than younger user groups. This calls for a different approach to assure their acceptance of technologies. In the STuDi research project, we constructed a set of interview guidelines based on literature on technology acceptance and requirements elicitation and validation with senior citizens, and conducted 33 validation interviews with senior citizens who used a prototypical AAL system for 5–12 months. The guidelines facilitated pleasant conversations and helped obtain a good understanding of factors contributing to acceptance versus avoidance and dismissal of the AAL system. We share the findings of our literature search and the resulting interview guidelines, which we consider a suitable instrument for researchers and practitioners for measuring technology acceptance and/or validating a (prototypical) system with senior citizens, and possibly also for requirements elicitation.","PeriodicalId":393646,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for Validation Interviews with Senior Citizens\",\"authors\":\"Eduard C. Groen, S. Polst\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REW53955.2021.00047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an aging population, technology-based solutions such as Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) systems are indispensable for supporting senior citizens in retaining their independence. Senior citizens have different physical abilities, contexts of use, and attitudes towards technology than younger user groups. This calls for a different approach to assure their acceptance of technologies. In the STuDi research project, we constructed a set of interview guidelines based on literature on technology acceptance and requirements elicitation and validation with senior citizens, and conducted 33 validation interviews with senior citizens who used a prototypical AAL system for 5–12 months. The guidelines facilitated pleasant conversations and helped obtain a good understanding of factors contributing to acceptance versus avoidance and dismissal of the AAL system. We share the findings of our literature search and the resulting interview guidelines, which we consider a suitable instrument for researchers and practitioners for measuring technology acceptance and/or validating a (prototypical) system with senior citizens, and possibly also for requirements elicitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REW53955.2021.00047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REW53955.2021.00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在人口老龄化中,以技术为基础的解决方案,如环境辅助生活(AAL)系统,对于支持老年人保持独立性是必不可少的。与年轻用户群体相比,老年人有不同的身体能力、使用环境和对技术的态度。这就要求采取不同的方法来确保它们接受技术。在STuDi研究项目中,我们基于技术接受和老年人需求的启发和验证的文献构建了一套访谈指南,并对使用AAL系统原型的老年人进行了33次验证访谈,为期5-12个月。该指南促进了愉快的对话,并有助于获得对AAL系统的接受、回避和驳回因素的良好理解。我们分享我们文献检索的发现和最终的访谈指南,我们认为这是研究人员和实践者测量技术接受度和/或与老年人验证(原型)系统的合适工具,也可能用于需求引出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for Validation Interviews with Senior Citizens
In an aging population, technology-based solutions such as Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) systems are indispensable for supporting senior citizens in retaining their independence. Senior citizens have different physical abilities, contexts of use, and attitudes towards technology than younger user groups. This calls for a different approach to assure their acceptance of technologies. In the STuDi research project, we constructed a set of interview guidelines based on literature on technology acceptance and requirements elicitation and validation with senior citizens, and conducted 33 validation interviews with senior citizens who used a prototypical AAL system for 5–12 months. The guidelines facilitated pleasant conversations and helped obtain a good understanding of factors contributing to acceptance versus avoidance and dismissal of the AAL system. We share the findings of our literature search and the resulting interview guidelines, which we consider a suitable instrument for researchers and practitioners for measuring technology acceptance and/or validating a (prototypical) system with senior citizens, and possibly also for requirements elicitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信