VLSI互连串扰峰值超调分析

C. Venkataiah, D. Setty, N. Ramanjaneyulu, Y. M. Rao
{"title":"VLSI互连串扰峰值超调分析","authors":"C. Venkataiah, D. Setty, N. Ramanjaneyulu, Y. M. Rao","doi":"10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technology extended from deep sub-micron technology to nanometer regimes, the conventional copper (Cu) wire will not be able to continue. Now a substitute approaches such as Carbon Nano Tube (CNT) interconnects have been suggested to ignore the problems associated with global interconnects. Hence in this work, crosstalk analysis of Complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) buffer-driven of different interconnects have been analyzed for peak overshoot and overshoot width of Cu and CNTs for 16nm technology. For analyzing peak overshoot, the interconnect lengths are varied from 100um to 500um in 16 technology node for Cu, single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT). The values of the peak overshoot and overshoot width changes, as the interconnect length increases, the peak overshoot and width is going to be increases. As Compared to Cu, SWCNT and MWCNT, the peak overshoot and width for SWCNT is lesser than copper and MWCNT. The MWCNT interconnect is less than that of conventional Copper interconnects.","PeriodicalId":351005,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crosstalk Peak Overshoot Analysis of VLSI Interconnects\",\"authors\":\"C. Venkataiah, D. Setty, N. Ramanjaneyulu, Y. M. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As technology extended from deep sub-micron technology to nanometer regimes, the conventional copper (Cu) wire will not be able to continue. Now a substitute approaches such as Carbon Nano Tube (CNT) interconnects have been suggested to ignore the problems associated with global interconnects. Hence in this work, crosstalk analysis of Complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) buffer-driven of different interconnects have been analyzed for peak overshoot and overshoot width of Cu and CNTs for 16nm technology. For analyzing peak overshoot, the interconnect lengths are varied from 100um to 500um in 16 technology node for Cu, single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT). The values of the peak overshoot and overshoot width changes, as the interconnect length increases, the peak overshoot and width is going to be increases. As Compared to Cu, SWCNT and MWCNT, the peak overshoot and width for SWCNT is lesser than copper and MWCNT. The MWCNT interconnect is less than that of conventional Copper interconnects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58482/ijeresm.v2i1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术从深亚微米技术向纳米技术的发展,传统的铜线将无法继续发展。目前,碳纳米管(CNT)互连等替代方法已经被提出,以忽略与全局互连相关的问题。因此,在这项工作中,我们分析了互补金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)缓冲驱动的不同互连的串扰分析,用于16nm技术的Cu和CNTs的峰值超调和超调宽度。为了分析峰值超调,在铜、单壁碳纳米管(SWCNT)和多壁碳纳米管(MWCNT)的16个技术节点上,互连长度从100um到500um不等。峰值超调和超调宽度的值是变化的,随着互连长度的增加,峰值超调和超调宽度也会增加。与Cu、swcnts和MWCNT相比,swcnts的峰值超调量和宽度小于铜和MWCNT。MWCNT互连比传统的铜互连要小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crosstalk Peak Overshoot Analysis of VLSI Interconnects
As technology extended from deep sub-micron technology to nanometer regimes, the conventional copper (Cu) wire will not be able to continue. Now a substitute approaches such as Carbon Nano Tube (CNT) interconnects have been suggested to ignore the problems associated with global interconnects. Hence in this work, crosstalk analysis of Complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) buffer-driven of different interconnects have been analyzed for peak overshoot and overshoot width of Cu and CNTs for 16nm technology. For analyzing peak overshoot, the interconnect lengths are varied from 100um to 500um in 16 technology node for Cu, single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT). The values of the peak overshoot and overshoot width changes, as the interconnect length increases, the peak overshoot and width is going to be increases. As Compared to Cu, SWCNT and MWCNT, the peak overshoot and width for SWCNT is lesser than copper and MWCNT. The MWCNT interconnect is less than that of conventional Copper interconnects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信