情境下的诚信方法

Harry B. DeMaio
{"title":"情境下的诚信方法","authors":"Harry B. DeMaio","doi":"10.1080/19393559308551359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orthodoxy can be both beneficial and destructive. Without a certain amount of orthodoxy in defining security practices and terminology, for example, it would be impossible to develop useful standards. However, orthodoxy should never be an end in itself. Security professionals should be judged according to the effectiveness of their recommendations and actions, not by the number of individuals that quote from their catechism. And yet despite the valuable efforts of a number of professional associations and practitioners to develop a common body of knowledge for information security, I believe that we are inexorably moving toward a world in which circumstances are almost as important as standards and definitions. Such an existential approach to security does not imply an intellectual free-for-all; it means being pragmatic, responsive to individual situations, but in a disciplined and internally consistent manner.","PeriodicalId":207082,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Situational Approach to Integrity\",\"authors\":\"Harry B. DeMaio\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19393559308551359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Orthodoxy can be both beneficial and destructive. Without a certain amount of orthodoxy in defining security practices and terminology, for example, it would be impossible to develop useful standards. However, orthodoxy should never be an end in itself. Security professionals should be judged according to the effectiveness of their recommendations and actions, not by the number of individuals that quote from their catechism. And yet despite the valuable efforts of a number of professional associations and practitioners to develop a common body of knowledge for information security, I believe that we are inexorably moving toward a world in which circumstances are almost as important as standards and definitions. Such an existential approach to security does not imply an intellectual free-for-all; it means being pragmatic, responsive to individual situations, but in a disciplined and internally consistent manner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19393559308551359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19393559308551359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正统可能是有益的,也可能是有害的。例如,如果在定义安全实践和术语方面没有一定数量的正统观念,就不可能开发有用的标准。然而,正统本身不应该是目的。安全专业人员应该根据他们的建议和行动的有效性来判断,而不是根据引用他们的教义问答的个人数量。然而,尽管许多专业协会和从业者为开发信息安全的共同知识体系做出了宝贵的努力,我相信我们正在无情地走向一个环境几乎与标准和定义一样重要的世界。这种对安全的存在主义态度并不意味着智力上的自由;这意味着要务实,对个别情况作出反应,但要有纪律和内部一致的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Situational Approach to Integrity
Orthodoxy can be both beneficial and destructive. Without a certain amount of orthodoxy in defining security practices and terminology, for example, it would be impossible to develop useful standards. However, orthodoxy should never be an end in itself. Security professionals should be judged according to the effectiveness of their recommendations and actions, not by the number of individuals that quote from their catechism. And yet despite the valuable efforts of a number of professional associations and practitioners to develop a common body of knowledge for information security, I believe that we are inexorably moving toward a world in which circumstances are almost as important as standards and definitions. Such an existential approach to security does not imply an intellectual free-for-all; it means being pragmatic, responsive to individual situations, but in a disciplined and internally consistent manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信