有限控制组MPC与连续控制组MPC在储能中同步降压变换器控制的性能比较

E. Garayalde, I. Aizpuru, U. Iraola, Iván Sanz, C. Bernal, E. Oyarbide
{"title":"有限控制组MPC与连续控制组MPC在储能中同步降压变换器控制的性能比较","authors":"E. Garayalde, I. Aizpuru, U. Iraola, Iván Sanz, C. Bernal, E. Oyarbide","doi":"10.1109/ICCEP.2019.8890127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model Predictive Control has been widely used in the las decade for the control of AC converters and drives. However, it was not so used for DC-DC conversion. In this sense, the increasing use of batteries in all kinds of applications has generated greater interest in applying this modern control technique to DC-DC converters. In this paper, the system has been evaluated under two different Model Predictive Control strategies. In Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control the switching states are directly selected and applied, while in Continuous Control Set Model Predictive Control an additional modulation stage is needed to do that job. The particularities of each algorithm have been studied and analyzed. Simulation results are included to display the steady state and dynamic response, and also to show the main differences between the two algorithms. Experimental results are included to validate the previously simulated comparative analysis.","PeriodicalId":277718,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite Control Set MPC vs Continuous Control Set MPC Performance Comparison for Synchronous Buck Converter Control in Energy Storage Application\",\"authors\":\"E. Garayalde, I. Aizpuru, U. Iraola, Iván Sanz, C. Bernal, E. Oyarbide\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCEP.2019.8890127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Model Predictive Control has been widely used in the las decade for the control of AC converters and drives. However, it was not so used for DC-DC conversion. In this sense, the increasing use of batteries in all kinds of applications has generated greater interest in applying this modern control technique to DC-DC converters. In this paper, the system has been evaluated under two different Model Predictive Control strategies. In Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control the switching states are directly selected and applied, while in Continuous Control Set Model Predictive Control an additional modulation stage is needed to do that job. The particularities of each algorithm have been studied and analyzed. Simulation results are included to display the steady state and dynamic response, and also to show the main differences between the two algorithms. Experimental results are included to validate the previously simulated comparative analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEP.2019.8890127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEP.2019.8890127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

模型预测控制在近十年来被广泛应用于交流变换器和变频器的控制。然而,它并没有如此用于DC-DC转换。从这个意义上说,在各种应用中越来越多地使用电池已经产生了将这种现代控制技术应用于DC-DC转换器的更大兴趣。本文在两种不同的模型预测控制策略下对系统进行了评估。在有限控制集模型预测控制中,开关状态直接选择和应用,而在连续控制集模型预测控制中,需要一个额外的调制阶段来完成这项工作。对每种算法的特点进行了研究和分析。仿真结果显示了稳态和动态响应,并显示了两种算法的主要区别。实验结果验证了之前的模拟对比分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite Control Set MPC vs Continuous Control Set MPC Performance Comparison for Synchronous Buck Converter Control in Energy Storage Application
Model Predictive Control has been widely used in the las decade for the control of AC converters and drives. However, it was not so used for DC-DC conversion. In this sense, the increasing use of batteries in all kinds of applications has generated greater interest in applying this modern control technique to DC-DC converters. In this paper, the system has been evaluated under two different Model Predictive Control strategies. In Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control the switching states are directly selected and applied, while in Continuous Control Set Model Predictive Control an additional modulation stage is needed to do that job. The particularities of each algorithm have been studied and analyzed. Simulation results are included to display the steady state and dynamic response, and also to show the main differences between the two algorithms. Experimental results are included to validate the previously simulated comparative analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信