共享内存访问延迟分析的数据流模型

J. Staschulat, M. Bekooij
{"title":"共享内存访问延迟分析的数据流模型","authors":"J. Staschulat, M. Bekooij","doi":"10.1145/1629335.1629372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance analysis of applications in multi-core platforms is challenging because of temporal interference while accessing shared resources. Especially, memory arbiters introduce a non-constant delay which significantly influences the execution time of a task. In this paper, we selected a priority-based budget scheduler as memory arbiter which bounds temporal interference by construction and is well suited for bursty service provision. While existing performance analysis approaches assume a constant memory access latency leading to high overestimation, we propose in this paper a conservative data flow model for this scheduler, in which the history of memory accesses is considered.\n In a case study with an MP3-decoder for an ARM7 processor, we show that using a constant memory access latency for the selected scheduler results in an overestimation of three order of magnitudes. Compared to simulation, the proposed data flow model shows an overestimation of less than 3% while in previous work the overestimation was up to 104%. Furthermore, the proposed approach improves the performance by about 20% compared to a time-division-multiplex scheduler.","PeriodicalId":143573,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Embedded Software","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dataflow models for shared memory access latency analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Staschulat, M. Bekooij\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1629335.1629372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performance analysis of applications in multi-core platforms is challenging because of temporal interference while accessing shared resources. Especially, memory arbiters introduce a non-constant delay which significantly influences the execution time of a task. In this paper, we selected a priority-based budget scheduler as memory arbiter which bounds temporal interference by construction and is well suited for bursty service provision. While existing performance analysis approaches assume a constant memory access latency leading to high overestimation, we propose in this paper a conservative data flow model for this scheduler, in which the history of memory accesses is considered.\\n In a case study with an MP3-decoder for an ARM7 processor, we show that using a constant memory access latency for the selected scheduler results in an overestimation of three order of magnitudes. Compared to simulation, the proposed data flow model shows an overestimation of less than 3% while in previous work the overestimation was up to 104%. Furthermore, the proposed approach improves the performance by about 20% compared to a time-division-multiplex scheduler.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Embedded Software\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Embedded Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1629335.1629372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Embedded Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1629335.1629372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

由于访问共享资源时的时间干扰,多核平台应用程序的性能分析具有挑战性。特别是,内存仲裁器引入了一个非恒定的延迟,这极大地影响了任务的执行时间。在本文中,我们选择了一个基于优先级的预算调度程序作为内存仲裁器,它通过构造限制了时间干扰,并且非常适合于突发服务的提供。虽然现有的性能分析方法假设一个恒定的内存访问延迟导致高度高估,但我们在本文中提出了一个保守的数据流模型,其中考虑了内存访问的历史。在一个针对ARM7处理器的mp3解码器的案例研究中,我们展示了为所选调度器使用恒定的内存访问延迟会导致三个数量级的高估。与仿真结果相比,本文提出的数据流模型的高估率不到3%,而在以往的研究中,该模型的高估率高达104%。此外,与时分多路调度程序相比,该方法的性能提高了约20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dataflow models for shared memory access latency analysis
Performance analysis of applications in multi-core platforms is challenging because of temporal interference while accessing shared resources. Especially, memory arbiters introduce a non-constant delay which significantly influences the execution time of a task. In this paper, we selected a priority-based budget scheduler as memory arbiter which bounds temporal interference by construction and is well suited for bursty service provision. While existing performance analysis approaches assume a constant memory access latency leading to high overestimation, we propose in this paper a conservative data flow model for this scheduler, in which the history of memory accesses is considered. In a case study with an MP3-decoder for an ARM7 processor, we show that using a constant memory access latency for the selected scheduler results in an overestimation of three order of magnitudes. Compared to simulation, the proposed data flow model shows an overestimation of less than 3% while in previous work the overestimation was up to 104%. Furthermore, the proposed approach improves the performance by about 20% compared to a time-division-multiplex scheduler.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信