技术与法律中的人与权:质疑是一条道路

J. Gaakeer
{"title":"技术与法律中的人与权:质疑是一条道路","authors":"J. Gaakeer","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442480.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 12 examines the relation between biotechnology, law and literature. Following Ricoeur’s distinction between ipse selfhood, i.e. the way in which one perceives oneself in the course of a lifetime’s development, and idem selfhood, the term denoting the way in which the other perceives me, e.g. that I am thought of as a legal subject when the situation is legal, or how my fingerprints or DNA make me uniquely me, it considers questions of identity and selfhood, and what makes us human. It does so by offering two readings of Michel Houellebecq’s novel Atomised (The Elementary Particles), and Heidegger’s view on technology in relation to poièsis as “making” something. It then asks after the effects of technology on (legal) personhood and narrative identity when technology is employed instrumentally without sensitivity to its darker side effects such as loss of privacy, freedom, or individuality.","PeriodicalId":231297,"journal":{"name":"Judging from Experience","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Person and Poiesis in Technology and Law: Questioning Builds a Way\",\"authors\":\"J. Gaakeer\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442480.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 12 examines the relation between biotechnology, law and literature. Following Ricoeur’s distinction between ipse selfhood, i.e. the way in which one perceives oneself in the course of a lifetime’s development, and idem selfhood, the term denoting the way in which the other perceives me, e.g. that I am thought of as a legal subject when the situation is legal, or how my fingerprints or DNA make me uniquely me, it considers questions of identity and selfhood, and what makes us human. It does so by offering two readings of Michel Houellebecq’s novel Atomised (The Elementary Particles), and Heidegger’s view on technology in relation to poièsis as “making” something. It then asks after the effects of technology on (legal) personhood and narrative identity when technology is employed instrumentally without sensitivity to its darker side effects such as loss of privacy, freedom, or individuality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judging from Experience\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judging from Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442480.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judging from Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442480.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第12章考察了生物技术、法律和文学之间的关系。根据Ricoeur对ipse self - hood和idem self - hood的区分,ipse self是指一个人在一生的发展过程中感知自己的方式,idem self是指他人感知我的方式,例如,当情况合法时,我被认为是一个法律主体,或者我的指纹或DNA如何使我成为独一无二的我,它考虑了身份和自我的问题,以及是什么使我们成为人类。通过对米歇尔·维勒贝克的小说《原子化》(基本粒子)的两种解读,以及海德格尔关于技术与“制造”某种东西的点的关系的观点,它做到了这一点。然后,当技术被用作工具而没有对其黑暗的副作用(如隐私、自由或个性的丧失)敏感时,它会询问技术对(法律)人格和叙事身份的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Person and Poiesis in Technology and Law: Questioning Builds a Way
Chapter 12 examines the relation between biotechnology, law and literature. Following Ricoeur’s distinction between ipse selfhood, i.e. the way in which one perceives oneself in the course of a lifetime’s development, and idem selfhood, the term denoting the way in which the other perceives me, e.g. that I am thought of as a legal subject when the situation is legal, or how my fingerprints or DNA make me uniquely me, it considers questions of identity and selfhood, and what makes us human. It does so by offering two readings of Michel Houellebecq’s novel Atomised (The Elementary Particles), and Heidegger’s view on technology in relation to poièsis as “making” something. It then asks after the effects of technology on (legal) personhood and narrative identity when technology is employed instrumentally without sensitivity to its darker side effects such as loss of privacy, freedom, or individuality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信