LibSift: Android应用程序中第三方库的自动检测

C. Soh, Hee Beng Kuan Tan, Y. Arnatovich, A. Narayanan, Lipo Wang
{"title":"LibSift: Android应用程序中第三方库的自动检测","authors":"C. Soh, Hee Beng Kuan Tan, Y. Arnatovich, A. Narayanan, Lipo Wang","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2016.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Android applications typically contain multiple third-party libraries and recent studies have shown that the presence of third-party libraries may introduce privacy risks and security threats. Furthermore, researchers have reported the importance of considering the third-party libraries for their program analysis tasks. A reason being that the presence of third-party libraries may dilute the features and affect the accuracy of their results. Existing literature typically employs a whitelist to exclude the third-party libraries from their analysis in order to achieve accurate results. However, these whitelists are generally incomplete and weak against the renaming obfuscation technique that is commonly employed in Android applications. In this paper, we propose LibSift, a tool to automatically detect third-party libraries in Android applications. LibSift detects third-party libraries based on package dependencies that are resilient to most common obfuscations. The evaluation results not only indicate that LibSift can detect third-party libraries accurately and effectively, but also show that LibSift can detect even the less popular libraries that are not detected by two of the state-of-the-art approaches.","PeriodicalId":339123,"journal":{"name":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LibSift: Automated Detection of Third-Party Libraries in Android Applications\",\"authors\":\"C. Soh, Hee Beng Kuan Tan, Y. Arnatovich, A. Narayanan, Lipo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2016.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Android applications typically contain multiple third-party libraries and recent studies have shown that the presence of third-party libraries may introduce privacy risks and security threats. Furthermore, researchers have reported the importance of considering the third-party libraries for their program analysis tasks. A reason being that the presence of third-party libraries may dilute the features and affect the accuracy of their results. Existing literature typically employs a whitelist to exclude the third-party libraries from their analysis in order to achieve accurate results. However, these whitelists are generally incomplete and weak against the renaming obfuscation technique that is commonly employed in Android applications. In this paper, we propose LibSift, a tool to automatically detect third-party libraries in Android applications. LibSift detects third-party libraries based on package dependencies that are resilient to most common obfuscations. The evaluation results not only indicate that LibSift can detect third-party libraries accurately and effectively, but also show that LibSift can detect even the less popular libraries that are not detected by two of the state-of-the-art approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

Android应用程序通常包含多个第三方库,最近的研究表明,第三方库的存在可能会带来隐私风险和安全威胁。此外,研究人员已经报告了在他们的程序分析任务中考虑第三方库的重要性。一个原因是第三方库的存在可能会削弱特性并影响其结果的准确性。现有文献通常使用白名单将第三方库排除在分析之外,以获得准确的结果。然而,这些白名单通常是不完整的,对于Android应用程序中常用的重命名混淆技术来说,它们是很弱的。在本文中,我们提出LibSift,一个自动检测Android应用程序中的第三方库的工具。LibSift根据包依赖关系检测第三方库,这些依赖关系对最常见的混淆具有弹性。评估结果不仅表明LibSift可以准确有效地检测第三方库,而且还表明LibSift甚至可以检测到两种最先进的方法无法检测到的不太流行的库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LibSift: Automated Detection of Third-Party Libraries in Android Applications
Android applications typically contain multiple third-party libraries and recent studies have shown that the presence of third-party libraries may introduce privacy risks and security threats. Furthermore, researchers have reported the importance of considering the third-party libraries for their program analysis tasks. A reason being that the presence of third-party libraries may dilute the features and affect the accuracy of their results. Existing literature typically employs a whitelist to exclude the third-party libraries from their analysis in order to achieve accurate results. However, these whitelists are generally incomplete and weak against the renaming obfuscation technique that is commonly employed in Android applications. In this paper, we propose LibSift, a tool to automatically detect third-party libraries in Android applications. LibSift detects third-party libraries based on package dependencies that are resilient to most common obfuscations. The evaluation results not only indicate that LibSift can detect third-party libraries accurately and effectively, but also show that LibSift can detect even the less popular libraries that are not detected by two of the state-of-the-art approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信