互助保险公司对2015年9月11日《保险和再保险活动法》第18(1)和(2)条的适用

Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz
{"title":"互助保险公司对2015年9月11日《保险和再保险活动法》第18(1)和(2)条的适用","authors":"Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act of 11 September 2015 on insurance and reinsurance activity introduced a ban on remunerating the policyholder and persons representing the policyholder in insurance on someone else's account for offering insurance cover or for actions related to the performance of insurance contracts. The reason for such legal regulation was to eliminate a market practice which enabled the policyholder to receive fees or other benefits for actions related to providing insurance cover under contracts on someone else's account (mainly group insurance) or to the performance thereof. Although said provision applies to insurers operating in various forms, mutual insurance companies implementing the principle of mutuality in their activities may account for the profit generated in the insurance history. Pursuant to Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act, the ban to receive remuneration or other benefits applies exclusively to insurance actions specified by the legislator, i.e. to (i) offering and/or (ii) performing an insurance contract. The payment or settlement of a positive insurance result does not constitute a benefit for the insured referred to in said provision. Therefore, the ban does not apply in such situation, however this does not mean that the obligation to settle accounts with persons who actually bear the cost of insurance protection may be ignored.","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Article 18(1) and (2) of the Insurance and Reinsurance Activity Act of 11 September 2015 by Mutual Insurance Companies\",\"authors\":\"Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act of 11 September 2015 on insurance and reinsurance activity introduced a ban on remunerating the policyholder and persons representing the policyholder in insurance on someone else's account for offering insurance cover or for actions related to the performance of insurance contracts. The reason for such legal regulation was to eliminate a market practice which enabled the policyholder to receive fees or other benefits for actions related to providing insurance cover under contracts on someone else's account (mainly group insurance) or to the performance thereof. Although said provision applies to insurers operating in various forms, mutual insurance companies implementing the principle of mutuality in their activities may account for the profit generated in the insurance history. Pursuant to Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act, the ban to receive remuneration or other benefits applies exclusively to insurance actions specified by the legislator, i.e. to (i) offering and/or (ii) performing an insurance contract. The payment or settlement of a positive insurance result does not constitute a benefit for the insured referred to in said provision. Therefore, the ban does not apply in such situation, however this does not mean that the obligation to settle accounts with persons who actually bear the cost of insurance protection may be ignored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prawo Asekuracyjne\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prawo Asekuracyjne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年9月11日关于保险和再保险活动的法案第18(1)和(2)条禁止向投保人和代表投保人的人支付他人账户保险或与履行保险合同有关的行为的报酬。制定这种法律规定的原因是为了消除一种市场惯例,这种惯例使投保人能够从与根据别人的帐户(主要是团体保险)提供保险或履行合同有关的行动中获得费用或其他利益。虽然上述规定适用于以各种形式经营的保险公司,但在其活动中实行互惠原则的互助保险公司可以在保险历史上核算产生的利润。根据本法第18条第(1)项和第(2)项,禁止接受报酬或其他利益仅适用于立法者指定的保险行为,即(i)提供和/或(ii)履行保险合同。积极保险结果的支付或结算不构成上述规定所述被保险人的利益。因此,禁令不适用于这种情况,但这并不意味着可以忽略与实际承担保险保护费用的人结帐的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Article 18(1) and (2) of the Insurance and Reinsurance Activity Act of 11 September 2015 by Mutual Insurance Companies
Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act of 11 September 2015 on insurance and reinsurance activity introduced a ban on remunerating the policyholder and persons representing the policyholder in insurance on someone else's account for offering insurance cover or for actions related to the performance of insurance contracts. The reason for such legal regulation was to eliminate a market practice which enabled the policyholder to receive fees or other benefits for actions related to providing insurance cover under contracts on someone else's account (mainly group insurance) or to the performance thereof. Although said provision applies to insurers operating in various forms, mutual insurance companies implementing the principle of mutuality in their activities may account for the profit generated in the insurance history. Pursuant to Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act, the ban to receive remuneration or other benefits applies exclusively to insurance actions specified by the legislator, i.e. to (i) offering and/or (ii) performing an insurance contract. The payment or settlement of a positive insurance result does not constitute a benefit for the insured referred to in said provision. Therefore, the ban does not apply in such situation, however this does not mean that the obligation to settle accounts with persons who actually bear the cost of insurance protection may be ignored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信