ICS- sea: ICS中冲突设计约束的形式化建模

Eyasu Getahun Chekole, Huaqun Guo
{"title":"ICS- sea: ICS中冲突设计约束的形式化建模","authors":"Eyasu Getahun Chekole, Huaqun Guo","doi":"10.1145/3372318.3372325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Industrial control systems (ICS) have been widely adopted in mission-critical infrastructures. However, the increasing prevalence of cyberattacks targeting them has been a critical security concern. On the other hand, the high real-time and availability requirements of ICS limits the applicability of certain available security solutions due to the performance overhead they introduce and the system unavailability they cause. Moreover, scientific metrics (mathematical models) are not available to evaluate the efficiency and resilience of security solutions in the ICS context. Hence, in this paper, we propose ICS-SEA to address the ICS design constraints of Security, Efficiency, and Availability (SEA). Our ICS-SEA formally models the real-time constraints and physical-state resiliency quantitatively based on a typical ICS. We then design two real-world ICS testbeds and evaluate the efficiency and resilience of a few selected security solutions using our defined models. The results show that our ICS-SEA is effective to evaluate security solutions against the SEA conflicting design constraints in ICS.","PeriodicalId":287941,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Industrial Control System Security (ICSS) Workshop","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICS-SEA: Formally Modeling the Conflicting Design Constraints in ICS\",\"authors\":\"Eyasu Getahun Chekole, Huaqun Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3372318.3372325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Industrial control systems (ICS) have been widely adopted in mission-critical infrastructures. However, the increasing prevalence of cyberattacks targeting them has been a critical security concern. On the other hand, the high real-time and availability requirements of ICS limits the applicability of certain available security solutions due to the performance overhead they introduce and the system unavailability they cause. Moreover, scientific metrics (mathematical models) are not available to evaluate the efficiency and resilience of security solutions in the ICS context. Hence, in this paper, we propose ICS-SEA to address the ICS design constraints of Security, Efficiency, and Availability (SEA). Our ICS-SEA formally models the real-time constraints and physical-state resiliency quantitatively based on a typical ICS. We then design two real-world ICS testbeds and evaluate the efficiency and resilience of a few selected security solutions using our defined models. The results show that our ICS-SEA is effective to evaluate security solutions against the SEA conflicting design constraints in ICS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Industrial Control System Security (ICSS) Workshop\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Industrial Control System Security (ICSS) Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3372318.3372325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Industrial Control System Security (ICSS) Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3372318.3372325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

工业控制系统(ICS)已广泛应用于关键任务基础设施中。然而,针对他们的网络攻击越来越普遍,已经成为一个关键的安全问题。另一方面,ICS的高实时性和高可用性要求限制了某些可用安全解决方案的适用性,因为它们会带来性能开销和系统不可用性。此外,科学指标(数学模型)无法用于评估ICS环境中安全解决方案的效率和弹性。因此,在本文中,我们提出ICS-SEA来解决ICS设计的安全性,效率和可用性(SEA)限制。我们的ICS- sea基于典型的ICS对实时约束和物理状态弹性进行了正式的定量建模。然后,我们设计了两个真实的ICS测试平台,并使用我们定义的模型评估了一些选定的安全解决方案的效率和弹性。结果表明,我们的ICS-SEA可以有效地评估ICS中针对SEA冲突设计约束的安全解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ICS-SEA: Formally Modeling the Conflicting Design Constraints in ICS
Industrial control systems (ICS) have been widely adopted in mission-critical infrastructures. However, the increasing prevalence of cyberattacks targeting them has been a critical security concern. On the other hand, the high real-time and availability requirements of ICS limits the applicability of certain available security solutions due to the performance overhead they introduce and the system unavailability they cause. Moreover, scientific metrics (mathematical models) are not available to evaluate the efficiency and resilience of security solutions in the ICS context. Hence, in this paper, we propose ICS-SEA to address the ICS design constraints of Security, Efficiency, and Availability (SEA). Our ICS-SEA formally models the real-time constraints and physical-state resiliency quantitatively based on a typical ICS. We then design two real-world ICS testbeds and evaluate the efficiency and resilience of a few selected security solutions using our defined models. The results show that our ICS-SEA is effective to evaluate security solutions against the SEA conflicting design constraints in ICS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信