风力发电机建模对可再生能源系统的影响

Hussein M. K. Al-Masri, M. Ehsani
{"title":"风力发电机建模对可再生能源系统的影响","authors":"Hussein M. K. Al-Masri, M. Ehsani","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2016.7747870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the influence of the wind turbine (WT) modeling on an on-grid wind energy system installed in Ibrahimyya, a city in Jordan. A closer look is taken at parameters affecting the output power for correctly modeling the system. This helps in monitoring the turbine performance, sizing of the wind farm and the entire system, which significantly affect the energy extracted per year (EEPY) from the wind turbines (WTs) and the entire system. The net present cost (NPC), grid operating cost (GOC), initial capital cost (ICC) and the cost of energy (COE) are affected. As the WT model changes from the linear to quadratic and on to the cubic model the system has progressively more percentage error in the estimation of the cost as well as EEPY, which cannot be neglected. In fact, the EEPY difference has to be supplied by the conventional generation of the utility grid, which is more expensive than wind energy. However, this is the result of imprecise sizing solutions, which result in error estimates for the project investment. So, an improved cubic model (ICM) is suggested to model the WT precisely by considering more parameters such as the air density. The WT model designed at sea level, shows error estimates in cost and EEPY compared with the ICM. This paper investigates the effects of elevation above sea level (a.s.l) and temperature to model the WT in addition to wind speed and WT power coefficient. Therefore, the simplified WT models will not deliver the EEPY that is theoretically possible. The more costly utility conventional fuel plants will have to replace this energy deficit. In other words, to solve a real-world problem, the real values for parameters affecting the WT model must be considered. This same procedure can be applied in any location worldwide.","PeriodicalId":249041,"journal":{"name":"2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of wind turbine modeling on a renewable energy system\",\"authors\":\"Hussein M. K. Al-Masri, M. Ehsani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAPS.2016.7747870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the influence of the wind turbine (WT) modeling on an on-grid wind energy system installed in Ibrahimyya, a city in Jordan. A closer look is taken at parameters affecting the output power for correctly modeling the system. This helps in monitoring the turbine performance, sizing of the wind farm and the entire system, which significantly affect the energy extracted per year (EEPY) from the wind turbines (WTs) and the entire system. The net present cost (NPC), grid operating cost (GOC), initial capital cost (ICC) and the cost of energy (COE) are affected. As the WT model changes from the linear to quadratic and on to the cubic model the system has progressively more percentage error in the estimation of the cost as well as EEPY, which cannot be neglected. In fact, the EEPY difference has to be supplied by the conventional generation of the utility grid, which is more expensive than wind energy. However, this is the result of imprecise sizing solutions, which result in error estimates for the project investment. So, an improved cubic model (ICM) is suggested to model the WT precisely by considering more parameters such as the air density. The WT model designed at sea level, shows error estimates in cost and EEPY compared with the ICM. This paper investigates the effects of elevation above sea level (a.s.l) and temperature to model the WT in addition to wind speed and WT power coefficient. Therefore, the simplified WT models will not deliver the EEPY that is theoretically possible. The more costly utility conventional fuel plants will have to replace this energy deficit. In other words, to solve a real-world problem, the real values for parameters affecting the WT model must be considered. This same procedure can be applied in any location worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2016.7747870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2016.7747870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文研究了风力发电机(WT)建模对约旦易卜拉欣亚市安装的并网风能系统的影响。仔细研究影响输出功率的参数,以便正确地对系统进行建模。这有助于监测涡轮机的性能,风电场和整个系统的规模,这对每年从风力涡轮机(WTs)和整个系统提取的能量(EEPY)有很大的影响。净现值成本(NPC)、电网运行成本(GOC)、初始资本成本(ICC)和能源成本(COE)受到影响。随着WT模型从线性模型到二次模型再到三次模型的变化,系统在估计成本和EEPY方面的百分比误差逐渐增大,这是不可忽视的。事实上,EEPY的差额必须由公用电网的传统发电提供,这比风能更昂贵。然而,这是不精确的规模解决方案的结果,这会导致对项目投资的错误估计。因此,提出了一种改进的三次模型(ICM),通过考虑更多的参数(如空气密度)来精确地建模小波变换。与ICM相比,在海平面设计的WT模型显示了成本和EEPY的误差估计。本文研究了海拔高度和温度、风速和功率系数对小波模型的影响。因此,简化的WT模型不会提供理论上可能的EEPY。更昂贵的公用事业传统燃料工厂将不得不取代这种能源赤字。换句话说,要解决现实世界的问题,必须考虑影响WT模型的参数的真实值。同样的程序可以在世界上任何地方应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of wind turbine modeling on a renewable energy system
This paper investigates the influence of the wind turbine (WT) modeling on an on-grid wind energy system installed in Ibrahimyya, a city in Jordan. A closer look is taken at parameters affecting the output power for correctly modeling the system. This helps in monitoring the turbine performance, sizing of the wind farm and the entire system, which significantly affect the energy extracted per year (EEPY) from the wind turbines (WTs) and the entire system. The net present cost (NPC), grid operating cost (GOC), initial capital cost (ICC) and the cost of energy (COE) are affected. As the WT model changes from the linear to quadratic and on to the cubic model the system has progressively more percentage error in the estimation of the cost as well as EEPY, which cannot be neglected. In fact, the EEPY difference has to be supplied by the conventional generation of the utility grid, which is more expensive than wind energy. However, this is the result of imprecise sizing solutions, which result in error estimates for the project investment. So, an improved cubic model (ICM) is suggested to model the WT precisely by considering more parameters such as the air density. The WT model designed at sea level, shows error estimates in cost and EEPY compared with the ICM. This paper investigates the effects of elevation above sea level (a.s.l) and temperature to model the WT in addition to wind speed and WT power coefficient. Therefore, the simplified WT models will not deliver the EEPY that is theoretically possible. The more costly utility conventional fuel plants will have to replace this energy deficit. In other words, to solve a real-world problem, the real values for parameters affecting the WT model must be considered. This same procedure can be applied in any location worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信