{"title":"工作数据主体的保护问题:数据生产的社会关系","authors":"Phoebe V. Moore","doi":"10.1332/ukge7444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production’ argues that existing AI and data and privacy regulation do not sufficiently provide protections from harm in the context of data extraction and mining. This is because the approaches taken are individualist in relational positioning and do not take into account differences across data subject types. The argument updates legal philosophical arguments rooted in propertarian and identitarian assumptions for how data harms can be prevented, arguing that what is needed is a discussion of the social relations of data production and the portrayal of a constellation of power relations rather than identifying a data subject as suspended in midair.","PeriodicalId":302702,"journal":{"name":"Global Political Economy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production\",\"authors\":\"Phoebe V. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/ukge7444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production’ argues that existing AI and data and privacy regulation do not sufficiently provide protections from harm in the context of data extraction and mining. This is because the approaches taken are individualist in relational positioning and do not take into account differences across data subject types. The argument updates legal philosophical arguments rooted in propertarian and identitarian assumptions for how data harms can be prevented, arguing that what is needed is a discussion of the social relations of data production and the portrayal of a constellation of power relations rather than identifying a data subject as suspended in midair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/ukge7444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/ukge7444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production
‘Problems in protections for working data subjects: the social relations of data production’ argues that existing AI and data and privacy regulation do not sufficiently provide protections from harm in the context of data extraction and mining. This is because the approaches taken are individualist in relational positioning and do not take into account differences across data subject types. The argument updates legal philosophical arguments rooted in propertarian and identitarian assumptions for how data harms can be prevented, arguing that what is needed is a discussion of the social relations of data production and the portrayal of a constellation of power relations rather than identifying a data subject as suspended in midair.