{"title":"利用最大平均差异理解反事实生成","authors":"Wei Zhang, Brian Barr, J. Paisley","doi":"10.1145/3533271.3561759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the dramatic development of deep learning in the past decade, interpretability has been one of the most important challenges that often prevents neural networks from being applied to fields such as finance. Among many existing explainable analyses, counterfactual generation has become widely used for understanding neural networks and making tailored recommendations. However, few studies are devoted to providing quantitative measures for evaluating counterfactuals. In this paper, we propose a quantitative approach based on maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). We employ several existing counterfactual methods to demonstrate this proposed method on the MNIST image data set and two tabular financial data sets, Lending Club (LCD) and Give Me Some Credit (GMC). The results demonstrate the potential usefulness as well as the simplicity of the proposed method.","PeriodicalId":134888,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Counterfactual Generation using Maximum Mean Discrepancy\",\"authors\":\"Wei Zhang, Brian Barr, J. Paisley\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3533271.3561759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the dramatic development of deep learning in the past decade, interpretability has been one of the most important challenges that often prevents neural networks from being applied to fields such as finance. Among many existing explainable analyses, counterfactual generation has become widely used for understanding neural networks and making tailored recommendations. However, few studies are devoted to providing quantitative measures for evaluating counterfactuals. In this paper, we propose a quantitative approach based on maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). We employ several existing counterfactual methods to demonstrate this proposed method on the MNIST image data set and two tabular financial data sets, Lending Club (LCD) and Give Me Some Credit (GMC). The results demonstrate the potential usefulness as well as the simplicity of the proposed method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3533271.3561759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3533271.3561759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
随着过去十年深度学习的迅猛发展,可解释性一直是阻碍神经网络应用于金融等领域的最重要挑战之一。在许多现有的可解释分析中,反事实生成已被广泛用于理解神经网络并提出量身定制的建议。然而,很少有研究致力于提供定量的方法来评估反事实。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于最大平均差异(MMD)的定量方法。我们采用了几种现有的反事实方法,在MNIST图像数据集和两个表格金融数据集,Lending Club (LCD)和Give Me Some Credit (GMC)上验证了该方法。结果表明,该方法具有潜在的实用性和简单性。
Understanding Counterfactual Generation using Maximum Mean Discrepancy
With the dramatic development of deep learning in the past decade, interpretability has been one of the most important challenges that often prevents neural networks from being applied to fields such as finance. Among many existing explainable analyses, counterfactual generation has become widely used for understanding neural networks and making tailored recommendations. However, few studies are devoted to providing quantitative measures for evaluating counterfactuals. In this paper, we propose a quantitative approach based on maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). We employ several existing counterfactual methods to demonstrate this proposed method on the MNIST image data set and two tabular financial data sets, Lending Club (LCD) and Give Me Some Credit (GMC). The results demonstrate the potential usefulness as well as the simplicity of the proposed method.