麻醉与感染控制

M. Kannan, S. Santhosh
{"title":"麻醉与感染控制","authors":"M. Kannan, S. Santhosh","doi":"10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anesthesiologists are well versed in the aseptic nature of surgical procedures. Maintaining sterility of the operating field is in the DNA of every anesthesiologist. In this background, it is intriguing that Infection Control within Anesthesia Work Environment (AWE) garners little to no interest. To most anesthesiologists, Infection Control is changing breathing circuits in between cases, drawing new medications, administering antibiotics, wearing gloves while administering care and performing procedures with universal precautions. There are complex layers of reason for this unique situation. 1. The lack of training in Infection Control. The traditional training of anesthesiologists involves a three to four year residency program that provides exposure to different facets of anesthesiology. Most anesthesiologists are familiar with checklists and protocols for different problems during the peri-operative period. During training, most anesthesiologists get introduced to sterile surgical technique. However there is no formal training or education in Infection Control in the AWE. 2. “What the eye does not see and the mind does not know, doesn’t exist- D.H Lawrence- English Poet.” During the perioperative process,an anesthesiologist frequently encounter problems in a patient- the symptoms and signs of these problems readily manifest. It is a reflex for anesthesiologists to handle these problems. However poor infection control processes do not manifest in any immediate issues for the anesthesiologists. In most cases, patients may be discharged from the hospital and most anesthesiologist may never have a second encounter with the same patient. 3. The lack of resources or tools to improve Infection Control. AWE is contaminated with blood and biological matter from the patient. Clean and dirty equipments are frequently mixed. Clean areas are touched with contaminated gloved hands. Hand Hygiene as per WHO guidelines has been shown to be difficult to adhere during the peri-operative process. 4. The protocol to clean AWE primarily remains wiping the Anesthesia Machine and work surfaces with sanitizing wipes. There is little monitoring, training and validation of cleaning protocols. After a wipe down, there are no checks or validated assessment to ensure AWE is clean. It is important to differentiate between clean versus sterile environment. Sterile environment which is used for surgical environment denotes an absence of microorganism. Clean environment which is generally accepted for AWE means free of dirt, marks or stains to reduce the overall number of organisms[1]. Current Evidences demonstrate that Environmental Hygiene play an important role in development of infections during hospitalization. Patients placed in contaminated rooms or surroundings have a higher chance of acquiring an infection[26]. Several pathogens like Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter, Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE), pseudomonas are known to exist on surfaces of healthcare facilities or equipment for months [7-14]. Table in an article published by Dancer in Clinical Microbiology Review in 2014 demonstrates this. Do these results translate to anesthesia environment? Loftus et al showed that pathogens on anesthesia machine surfaces directly colonized stopcocks on intravenous sets of patients. In their series of studies they documented incidence of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) transmission via Anesthesia Environment at 32% and two thirds of stopcock contamination had the source from anesthesia environment [15]. In a continuous series of work Loftus et al have demonstrated the transmission of several pathogenic bacteria including MRSA and gram negative bacteria in the Anesthesia Work Environment. Their work has clearly mapped the epidemiology of pathogens in the AWE[16-19]. The evidence points to the need for increased awareness, education and introduction of new practical systems that will prevent contamination and colonization of Anesthesia Work Environment. It is important to recognize the role of the AWE as a reservoir and vector for pathogens potentially leading to infection during the Perioperative period. Hand hygiene is an important methodology to reduce Healthcare Acquired Infections (HAI). However, hand hygiene has been shown to impractical during delivery of Anesthesia and did not reduce contamination of AWE[20]. Anesthesia Hygiene, a company based out of Miami, Florida, USA, designs tools to protect and organize Anesthesia Work Environment to reduce contamination of the AWE. An independent study by Biddle et al quantified the reduction of contamination in the AWE[21]. A larger study will be needed to confirm if this translates into a reduction in perioperative surgical infections.","PeriodicalId":448126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesia and Infection Control\",\"authors\":\"M. Kannan, S. Santhosh\",\"doi\":\"10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anesthesiologists are well versed in the aseptic nature of surgical procedures. Maintaining sterility of the operating field is in the DNA of every anesthesiologist. In this background, it is intriguing that Infection Control within Anesthesia Work Environment (AWE) garners little to no interest. To most anesthesiologists, Infection Control is changing breathing circuits in between cases, drawing new medications, administering antibiotics, wearing gloves while administering care and performing procedures with universal precautions. There are complex layers of reason for this unique situation. 1. The lack of training in Infection Control. The traditional training of anesthesiologists involves a three to four year residency program that provides exposure to different facets of anesthesiology. Most anesthesiologists are familiar with checklists and protocols for different problems during the peri-operative period. During training, most anesthesiologists get introduced to sterile surgical technique. However there is no formal training or education in Infection Control in the AWE. 2. “What the eye does not see and the mind does not know, doesn’t exist- D.H Lawrence- English Poet.” During the perioperative process,an anesthesiologist frequently encounter problems in a patient- the symptoms and signs of these problems readily manifest. It is a reflex for anesthesiologists to handle these problems. However poor infection control processes do not manifest in any immediate issues for the anesthesiologists. In most cases, patients may be discharged from the hospital and most anesthesiologist may never have a second encounter with the same patient. 3. The lack of resources or tools to improve Infection Control. AWE is contaminated with blood and biological matter from the patient. Clean and dirty equipments are frequently mixed. Clean areas are touched with contaminated gloved hands. Hand Hygiene as per WHO guidelines has been shown to be difficult to adhere during the peri-operative process. 4. The protocol to clean AWE primarily remains wiping the Anesthesia Machine and work surfaces with sanitizing wipes. There is little monitoring, training and validation of cleaning protocols. After a wipe down, there are no checks or validated assessment to ensure AWE is clean. It is important to differentiate between clean versus sterile environment. Sterile environment which is used for surgical environment denotes an absence of microorganism. Clean environment which is generally accepted for AWE means free of dirt, marks or stains to reduce the overall number of organisms[1]. Current Evidences demonstrate that Environmental Hygiene play an important role in development of infections during hospitalization. Patients placed in contaminated rooms or surroundings have a higher chance of acquiring an infection[26]. Several pathogens like Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter, Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE), pseudomonas are known to exist on surfaces of healthcare facilities or equipment for months [7-14]. Table in an article published by Dancer in Clinical Microbiology Review in 2014 demonstrates this. Do these results translate to anesthesia environment? Loftus et al showed that pathogens on anesthesia machine surfaces directly colonized stopcocks on intravenous sets of patients. In their series of studies they documented incidence of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) transmission via Anesthesia Environment at 32% and two thirds of stopcock contamination had the source from anesthesia environment [15]. In a continuous series of work Loftus et al have demonstrated the transmission of several pathogenic bacteria including MRSA and gram negative bacteria in the Anesthesia Work Environment. Their work has clearly mapped the epidemiology of pathogens in the AWE[16-19]. The evidence points to the need for increased awareness, education and introduction of new practical systems that will prevent contamination and colonization of Anesthesia Work Environment. It is important to recognize the role of the AWE as a reservoir and vector for pathogens potentially leading to infection during the Perioperative period. Hand hygiene is an important methodology to reduce Healthcare Acquired Infections (HAI). However, hand hygiene has been shown to impractical during delivery of Anesthesia and did not reduce contamination of AWE[20]. Anesthesia Hygiene, a company based out of Miami, Florida, USA, designs tools to protect and organize Anesthesia Work Environment to reduce contamination of the AWE. An independent study by Biddle et al quantified the reduction of contamination in the AWE[21]. A larger study will be needed to confirm if this translates into a reduction in perioperative surgical infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jaccr.2018.v04i02.090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麻醉师精通外科手术的无菌性。保持手术室无菌是每个麻醉师的天性。在这种背景下,麻醉工作环境中的感染控制(AWE)很少或没有引起人们的兴趣,这是很有趣的。对大多数麻醉师来说,感染控制是在病例之间改变呼吸回路,使用新的药物,使用抗生素,在进行护理时戴手套,并采取普遍的预防措施。造成这种特殊情况的原因有很复杂的层次。1. 缺乏感染控制方面的培训。麻醉师的传统培训包括三到四年的住院医师培训,提供麻醉学不同方面的接触。大多数麻醉师都熟悉围手术期不同问题的检查表和方案。在培训期间,大多数麻醉师都会学习无菌手术技术。然而,在AWE中没有关于感染控制的正式培训或教育。2. 眼睛看不见,头脑不知道的东西是不存在的- d·h·劳伦斯,英国诗人。在围手术期,麻醉师经常遇到病人的问题——这些问题的症状和体征很容易表现出来。麻醉师处理这些问题是一种本能反应。然而,不良的感染控制过程并没有表现为麻醉师的任何直接问题。在大多数情况下,患者可能出院,大多数麻醉师可能永远不会与同一患者第二次接触。3.缺乏改善感染控制的资源或工具。AWE被患者的血液和生物物质污染。清洁设备和脏设备经常混在一起。清洁区域被戴着污染手套的手接触。事实证明,在围手术期很难遵守世卫组织指南规定的手部卫生。4. 清洁AWE的方案主要是用消毒湿巾擦拭麻醉机和工作表面。几乎没有对清洁规程的监控、培训和验证。在擦拭之后,没有检查或验证评估来确保AWE是干净的。区分清洁环境和无菌环境是很重要的。无菌环境是指手术环境中没有微生物。洁净环境是AWE普遍接受的洁净环境,指无污垢、无痕迹、无污迹,以减少生物体总数[1]。目前的证据表明,环境卫生在住院期间感染的发展中起着重要作用。被置于受污染房间或环境中的患者感染的几率更高[26]。几种病原体,如多重耐药不动杆菌、万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)、假单胞菌,已知在医疗设施或设备表面存在数月[7-14]。2014年Dancer在《临床微生物学评论》上发表的一篇文章中的表格证明了这一点。这些结果是否适用于麻醉环境?lottus等研究表明,麻醉机表面的病原体直接定植在患者静脉注射套上的旋塞上。在他们的一系列研究中,他们记录了万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)通过麻醉环境传播的发生率为32%,三分之二的旋塞污染来自麻醉环境[15]。在一系列连续的工作中,lottus等人已经证明了包括MRSA和革兰氏阴性菌在内的几种致病菌在麻醉工作环境中的传播。他们的工作清楚地描绘了AWE病原体的流行病学[16-19]。证据表明,需要提高认识,教育和引进新的实用系统,以防止麻醉工作环境的污染和定植。重要的是认识到AWE作为病原体的储存库和载体的作用,可能导致围手术期感染。手卫生是减少卫生保健获得性感染(HAI)的重要方法。然而,在麻醉过程中,手部卫生已被证明是不切实际的,并没有减少AWE的污染[20]。麻醉卫生是一家位于美国佛罗里达州迈阿密的公司,设计了保护和组织麻醉工作环境的工具,以减少AWE的污染。Biddle等人的一项独立研究量化了AWE中污染的减少[21]。需要更大规模的研究来证实这是否转化为围手术期手术感染的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anesthesia and Infection Control
Anesthesiologists are well versed in the aseptic nature of surgical procedures. Maintaining sterility of the operating field is in the DNA of every anesthesiologist. In this background, it is intriguing that Infection Control within Anesthesia Work Environment (AWE) garners little to no interest. To most anesthesiologists, Infection Control is changing breathing circuits in between cases, drawing new medications, administering antibiotics, wearing gloves while administering care and performing procedures with universal precautions. There are complex layers of reason for this unique situation. 1. The lack of training in Infection Control. The traditional training of anesthesiologists involves a three to four year residency program that provides exposure to different facets of anesthesiology. Most anesthesiologists are familiar with checklists and protocols for different problems during the peri-operative period. During training, most anesthesiologists get introduced to sterile surgical technique. However there is no formal training or education in Infection Control in the AWE. 2. “What the eye does not see and the mind does not know, doesn’t exist- D.H Lawrence- English Poet.” During the perioperative process,an anesthesiologist frequently encounter problems in a patient- the symptoms and signs of these problems readily manifest. It is a reflex for anesthesiologists to handle these problems. However poor infection control processes do not manifest in any immediate issues for the anesthesiologists. In most cases, patients may be discharged from the hospital and most anesthesiologist may never have a second encounter with the same patient. 3. The lack of resources or tools to improve Infection Control. AWE is contaminated with blood and biological matter from the patient. Clean and dirty equipments are frequently mixed. Clean areas are touched with contaminated gloved hands. Hand Hygiene as per WHO guidelines has been shown to be difficult to adhere during the peri-operative process. 4. The protocol to clean AWE primarily remains wiping the Anesthesia Machine and work surfaces with sanitizing wipes. There is little monitoring, training and validation of cleaning protocols. After a wipe down, there are no checks or validated assessment to ensure AWE is clean. It is important to differentiate between clean versus sterile environment. Sterile environment which is used for surgical environment denotes an absence of microorganism. Clean environment which is generally accepted for AWE means free of dirt, marks or stains to reduce the overall number of organisms[1]. Current Evidences demonstrate that Environmental Hygiene play an important role in development of infections during hospitalization. Patients placed in contaminated rooms or surroundings have a higher chance of acquiring an infection[26]. Several pathogens like Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter, Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE), pseudomonas are known to exist on surfaces of healthcare facilities or equipment for months [7-14]. Table in an article published by Dancer in Clinical Microbiology Review in 2014 demonstrates this. Do these results translate to anesthesia environment? Loftus et al showed that pathogens on anesthesia machine surfaces directly colonized stopcocks on intravenous sets of patients. In their series of studies they documented incidence of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) transmission via Anesthesia Environment at 32% and two thirds of stopcock contamination had the source from anesthesia environment [15]. In a continuous series of work Loftus et al have demonstrated the transmission of several pathogenic bacteria including MRSA and gram negative bacteria in the Anesthesia Work Environment. Their work has clearly mapped the epidemiology of pathogens in the AWE[16-19]. The evidence points to the need for increased awareness, education and introduction of new practical systems that will prevent contamination and colonization of Anesthesia Work Environment. It is important to recognize the role of the AWE as a reservoir and vector for pathogens potentially leading to infection during the Perioperative period. Hand hygiene is an important methodology to reduce Healthcare Acquired Infections (HAI). However, hand hygiene has been shown to impractical during delivery of Anesthesia and did not reduce contamination of AWE[20]. Anesthesia Hygiene, a company based out of Miami, Florida, USA, designs tools to protect and organize Anesthesia Work Environment to reduce contamination of the AWE. An independent study by Biddle et al quantified the reduction of contamination in the AWE[21]. A larger study will be needed to confirm if this translates into a reduction in perioperative surgical infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信