“支持向量机语音识别”对COVID-19患者的检测及与“K近邻算法”的比较

Rallapalli Jhansi, G. Uganya
{"title":"“支持向量机语音识别”对COVID-19患者的检测及与“K近邻算法”的比较","authors":"Rallapalli Jhansi, G. Uganya","doi":"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research endeavor is focused on identifying patients with the Covid-19 virus via the use of a novel voice recognition technique that makes use of a Support Vector Machine (abbreviated as “SVM”) and compares its accuracy with that of “K-Nearest Neighbor” (abbreviated as “KNN”). When it comes to speech recognition, the SVM method is regarded to be group 1, and the KNN method is considered to be group 2, and both groups have a total of 20 samples. The outcomes of these data were analyzed using statistical analysis using a”independent sample T-test,” which has a margin of error of 5% and a pretest power of 80%. At a significance of 0.042 (p 0.05), KNN obtains an accuracy of 87.5% whereas SVM achieves an accuracy of 96.5%. As compared to KNN, the prediction accuracy of Covid-19 employing SVM in novel voice recognition achieves much higher levels of accuracy.","PeriodicalId":436733,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","volume":"17 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of COVID-19 Patients using Speech Recognition with Support Vector Machine” and Comparing with “K Nearest Neighbour Algorithm”\",\"authors\":\"Rallapalli Jhansi, G. Uganya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research endeavor is focused on identifying patients with the Covid-19 virus via the use of a novel voice recognition technique that makes use of a Support Vector Machine (abbreviated as “SVM”) and compares its accuracy with that of “K-Nearest Neighbor” (abbreviated as “KNN”). When it comes to speech recognition, the SVM method is regarded to be group 1, and the KNN method is considered to be group 2, and both groups have a total of 20 samples. The outcomes of these data were analyzed using statistical analysis using a”independent sample T-test,” which has a margin of error of 5% and a pretest power of 80%. At a significance of 0.042 (p 0.05), KNN obtains an accuracy of 87.5% whereas SVM achieves an accuracy of 96.5%. As compared to KNN, the prediction accuracy of Covid-19 employing SVM in novel voice recognition achieves much higher levels of accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)\",\"volume\":\"17 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10083960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究的重点是通过使用一种新的语音识别技术来识别Covid-19病毒患者,该技术利用支持向量机(简称为“SVM”),并将其准确性与“k近邻”(简称为“KNN”)进行比较。在语音识别方面,将SVM方法视为第1组,将KNN方法视为第2组,两组共20个样本。这些数据的结果使用“独立样本t检验”的统计分析进行分析,其误差幅度为5%,预检验功率为80%。在显著性为0.042 (p 0.05)的情况下,KNN的准确率为87.5%,而SVM的准确率为96.5%。与KNN相比,在新型语音识别中使用SVM对Covid-19的预测精度达到了更高的精度水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of COVID-19 Patients using Speech Recognition with Support Vector Machine” and Comparing with “K Nearest Neighbour Algorithm”
This research endeavor is focused on identifying patients with the Covid-19 virus via the use of a novel voice recognition technique that makes use of a Support Vector Machine (abbreviated as “SVM”) and compares its accuracy with that of “K-Nearest Neighbor” (abbreviated as “KNN”). When it comes to speech recognition, the SVM method is regarded to be group 1, and the KNN method is considered to be group 2, and both groups have a total of 20 samples. The outcomes of these data were analyzed using statistical analysis using a”independent sample T-test,” which has a margin of error of 5% and a pretest power of 80%. At a significance of 0.042 (p 0.05), KNN obtains an accuracy of 87.5% whereas SVM achieves an accuracy of 96.5%. As compared to KNN, the prediction accuracy of Covid-19 employing SVM in novel voice recognition achieves much higher levels of accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信