基于模糊积分逻辑的时间规划与基于PDDL的时间规划

K. Jobczyk, A. Ligeza
{"title":"基于模糊积分逻辑的时间规划与基于PDDL的时间规划","authors":"K. Jobczyk, A. Ligeza","doi":"10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative analysis of expressive power of PDDL and its known extensions versus a language of a Fuzzy Logic for Integrals (as a far extension of Łukasiewicz logic) with respect to some components of temporal planning. This comparative perspective is determined not only by the problem of the representation of planning objects, actions and preferences, but also by some ability of both languages to express the plan construction.","PeriodicalId":136707,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal planning in terms of a fuzzy integral logic (FLI) versus temporal planning in PDDL\",\"authors\":\"K. Jobczyk, A. Ligeza\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative analysis of expressive power of PDDL and its known extensions versus a language of a Fuzzy Logic for Integrals (as a far extension of Łukasiewicz logic) with respect to some components of temporal planning. This comparative perspective is determined not only by the problem of the representation of planning objects, actions and preferences, but also by some ability of both languages to express the plan construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍了PDDL及其已知扩展与模糊积分逻辑语言(作为Łukasiewicz逻辑的远扩展)在时间规划的某些组件方面的表达能力的比较分析。这种比较视角不仅取决于规划对象、行动和偏好的表征问题,还取决于两种语言表达计划构建的某种能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal planning in terms of a fuzzy integral logic (FLI) versus temporal planning in PDDL
This paper presents a comparative analysis of expressive power of PDDL and its known extensions versus a language of a Fuzzy Logic for Integrals (as a far extension of Łukasiewicz logic) with respect to some components of temporal planning. This comparative perspective is determined not only by the problem of the representation of planning objects, actions and preferences, but also by some ability of both languages to express the plan construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信