知识在概念检索中的作用:临床医学领域的研究

Jimmy J. Lin, Dina Demner-Fushman
{"title":"知识在概念检索中的作用:临床医学领域的研究","authors":"Jimmy J. Lin, Dina Demner-Fushman","doi":"10.1145/1148170.1148191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its intuitive appeal, the hypothesis that retrieval at the level of \"concepts\" should outperform purely term-based approaches remains unverified empirically. In addition, the use of \"knowledge\" has not consistently resulted in performance gains. After identifying possible reasons for previous negative results, we present a novel framework for \"conceptual retrieval\" that articulates the types of knowledge that are important for information seeking. We instantiate this general framework in the domain of clinical medicine based on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Experiments show that an EBM-based scoring algorithm dramatically outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline that employs only term statistics. Ablation studies further yield a better understanding of the performance contributions of different components. Finally, we discuss how other domains can benefit from knowledge-based approaches.","PeriodicalId":433366,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of knowledge in conceptual retrieval: a study in the domain of clinical medicine\",\"authors\":\"Jimmy J. Lin, Dina Demner-Fushman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1148170.1148191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite its intuitive appeal, the hypothesis that retrieval at the level of \\\"concepts\\\" should outperform purely term-based approaches remains unverified empirically. In addition, the use of \\\"knowledge\\\" has not consistently resulted in performance gains. After identifying possible reasons for previous negative results, we present a novel framework for \\\"conceptual retrieval\\\" that articulates the types of knowledge that are important for information seeking. We instantiate this general framework in the domain of clinical medicine based on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Experiments show that an EBM-based scoring algorithm dramatically outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline that employs only term statistics. Ablation studies further yield a better understanding of the performance contributions of different components. Finally, we discuss how other domains can benefit from knowledge-based approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1148170.1148191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1148170.1148191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

摘要

尽管其直观的吸引力,在“概念”层面的检索应该优于纯基于术语的方法的假设仍然未经经验验证。此外,“知识”的使用并不总是带来性能提升。在确定了之前负面结果的可能原因之后,我们提出了一个新的“概念检索”框架,该框架阐明了对信息搜索重要的知识类型。我们在基于循证医学(EBM)原则的临床医学领域实例化了这一总体框架。实验表明,基于ebm的评分算法显著优于仅使用术语统计的最先进基线。烧蚀研究进一步使人们更好地了解不同组分对性能的贡献。最后,我们讨论了其他领域如何从基于知识的方法中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of knowledge in conceptual retrieval: a study in the domain of clinical medicine
Despite its intuitive appeal, the hypothesis that retrieval at the level of "concepts" should outperform purely term-based approaches remains unverified empirically. In addition, the use of "knowledge" has not consistently resulted in performance gains. After identifying possible reasons for previous negative results, we present a novel framework for "conceptual retrieval" that articulates the types of knowledge that are important for information seeking. We instantiate this general framework in the domain of clinical medicine based on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Experiments show that an EBM-based scoring algorithm dramatically outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline that employs only term statistics. Ablation studies further yield a better understanding of the performance contributions of different components. Finally, we discuss how other domains can benefit from knowledge-based approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信