用三轴加速度计检测阻力训练中的重复和时间特征

N. Brown, Sebastian Bichler, W. Alt
{"title":"用三轴加速度计检测阻力训练中的重复和时间特征","authors":"N. Brown, Sebastian Bichler, W. Alt","doi":"10.1080/19346182.2015.1064935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately determining resistance-training parameters is crucial to gain knowledge about the training process and to evaluate training interventions. To current knowledge, no method exists to automatically detect a series of features in a repetition training session using one three-dimensional accelerometer. In this study, a specific algorithm was used to detect the number of repetitions and different time features. Features determined by the acceleration algorithm were compared to a reference system using a linear wire encoder to detect movements. A total of 50 healthy participants were randomly assigned to three different groups (maximal strength, hypertrophy, and muscular endurance) and executed three different resistance-training exercises (bench press, leg press, and trunk flexion). Results of both measurement systems were compared for agreement using Bland–Altman plots, regarding repetition numbers, TUT (time under tension) in concentric, eccentric, and isometric contraction forms and total TUT (sum of all contraction forms) as well as break between repetitions. Both methods showed high agreement in repetition count (mean error − 0.2 ± 0.6 repetitions). Time features were detected with less agreement, with 10.0% disagreement for TUT in first phase, 1.1% disagreement for second phase, and 56% disagreement in isometric contraction. However, it was possible to detect a series of time-based movement features, enhancing the possibility to objectively record different parameters of a resistance training session. This will improve research in resistance training and also bring advantages in the training process for coach and athlete.","PeriodicalId":237335,"journal":{"name":"Sports Technology","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting repetitions and time features in resistance training using triaxial accelerometry\",\"authors\":\"N. Brown, Sebastian Bichler, W. Alt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19346182.2015.1064935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurately determining resistance-training parameters is crucial to gain knowledge about the training process and to evaluate training interventions. To current knowledge, no method exists to automatically detect a series of features in a repetition training session using one three-dimensional accelerometer. In this study, a specific algorithm was used to detect the number of repetitions and different time features. Features determined by the acceleration algorithm were compared to a reference system using a linear wire encoder to detect movements. A total of 50 healthy participants were randomly assigned to three different groups (maximal strength, hypertrophy, and muscular endurance) and executed three different resistance-training exercises (bench press, leg press, and trunk flexion). Results of both measurement systems were compared for agreement using Bland–Altman plots, regarding repetition numbers, TUT (time under tension) in concentric, eccentric, and isometric contraction forms and total TUT (sum of all contraction forms) as well as break between repetitions. Both methods showed high agreement in repetition count (mean error − 0.2 ± 0.6 repetitions). Time features were detected with less agreement, with 10.0% disagreement for TUT in first phase, 1.1% disagreement for second phase, and 56% disagreement in isometric contraction. However, it was possible to detect a series of time-based movement features, enhancing the possibility to objectively record different parameters of a resistance training session. This will improve research in resistance training and also bring advantages in the training process for coach and athlete.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Technology\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19346182.2015.1064935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19346182.2015.1064935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

准确确定阻力训练参数对于了解训练过程和评估训练干预措施至关重要。就目前所知,没有一种方法可以使用一个三维加速度计来自动检测重复训练过程中的一系列特征。在本研究中,使用了一种特定的算法来检测重复次数和不同的时间特征。由加速算法确定的特征与使用线性线编码器检测运动的参考系统进行了比较。总共50名健康参与者被随机分配到三个不同的组(最大力量、肥大和肌肉耐力),并进行三种不同的阻力训练(卧推、腿推和躯干弯曲)。使用Bland-Altman图比较两种测量系统的结果是否一致,包括重复次数、同心、偏心和等距收缩形式的TUT(张力下的时间)和总TUT(所有收缩形式的总和)以及重复之间的中断。两种方法在重复计数上的一致性很高(平均误差为−0.2±0.6)。时间特征检测的一致性较低,第一阶段TUT有10.0%的不一致,第二阶段有1.1%的不一致,等距收缩有56%的不一致。然而,它可以检测到一系列基于时间的运动特征,增强了客观记录阻力训练过程中不同参数的可能性。这将提高对阻力训练的研究水平,并为教练员和运动员在训练过程中带来优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting repetitions and time features in resistance training using triaxial accelerometry
Accurately determining resistance-training parameters is crucial to gain knowledge about the training process and to evaluate training interventions. To current knowledge, no method exists to automatically detect a series of features in a repetition training session using one three-dimensional accelerometer. In this study, a specific algorithm was used to detect the number of repetitions and different time features. Features determined by the acceleration algorithm were compared to a reference system using a linear wire encoder to detect movements. A total of 50 healthy participants were randomly assigned to three different groups (maximal strength, hypertrophy, and muscular endurance) and executed three different resistance-training exercises (bench press, leg press, and trunk flexion). Results of both measurement systems were compared for agreement using Bland–Altman plots, regarding repetition numbers, TUT (time under tension) in concentric, eccentric, and isometric contraction forms and total TUT (sum of all contraction forms) as well as break between repetitions. Both methods showed high agreement in repetition count (mean error − 0.2 ± 0.6 repetitions). Time features were detected with less agreement, with 10.0% disagreement for TUT in first phase, 1.1% disagreement for second phase, and 56% disagreement in isometric contraction. However, it was possible to detect a series of time-based movement features, enhancing the possibility to objectively record different parameters of a resistance training session. This will improve research in resistance training and also bring advantages in the training process for coach and athlete.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信