{"title":"立法通过授权在亚拉巴马州用于诊断目的的验光使用药物的历史","authors":"John F. Amos, OD, MS, DOS","doi":"10.14434/hindsight.v52i4.34344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article recalls events that led to the passage of legislation authorizing the use of drugs for diagnostic purposes by optometrists in other states prior to the law’s passage in the State of Alabama. Some states authorized optometrists to utilize drugs for diagnostic purposes by state statue and others by attorney general’s ruling. In Alabama a new state optometry practice act was passed in 1975. This law was complex and confusing, and of equal importance, resulted in a series of attorney general’s opinions, after the new state optometry practice act was passed. A series of Attorney General’s opinions shifted between a favorable, or an unfavorable, opinion over the next seven years. Finally, in 1982, the Attorney General issued a final determination that resulted in a favorable opinion for optometry. During the ensuing years no lawsuits were brought against optometrists that involved the use of drugs for diagnostic purposes.","PeriodicalId":377268,"journal":{"name":"Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The History of the Passage of Legislation Authorizing the Optometric Use of Drugs for Diagnostic Purposes in Alabama\",\"authors\":\"John F. Amos, OD, MS, DOS\",\"doi\":\"10.14434/hindsight.v52i4.34344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article recalls events that led to the passage of legislation authorizing the use of drugs for diagnostic purposes by optometrists in other states prior to the law’s passage in the State of Alabama. Some states authorized optometrists to utilize drugs for diagnostic purposes by state statue and others by attorney general’s ruling. In Alabama a new state optometry practice act was passed in 1975. This law was complex and confusing, and of equal importance, resulted in a series of attorney general’s opinions, after the new state optometry practice act was passed. A series of Attorney General’s opinions shifted between a favorable, or an unfavorable, opinion over the next seven years. Finally, in 1982, the Attorney General issued a final determination that resulted in a favorable opinion for optometry. During the ensuing years no lawsuits were brought against optometrists that involved the use of drugs for diagnostic purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14434/hindsight.v52i4.34344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hindsight: Journal of Optometry History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/hindsight.v52i4.34344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The History of the Passage of Legislation Authorizing the Optometric Use of Drugs for Diagnostic Purposes in Alabama
This article recalls events that led to the passage of legislation authorizing the use of drugs for diagnostic purposes by optometrists in other states prior to the law’s passage in the State of Alabama. Some states authorized optometrists to utilize drugs for diagnostic purposes by state statue and others by attorney general’s ruling. In Alabama a new state optometry practice act was passed in 1975. This law was complex and confusing, and of equal importance, resulted in a series of attorney general’s opinions, after the new state optometry practice act was passed. A series of Attorney General’s opinions shifted between a favorable, or an unfavorable, opinion over the next seven years. Finally, in 1982, the Attorney General issued a final determination that resulted in a favorable opinion for optometry. During the ensuing years no lawsuits were brought against optometrists that involved the use of drugs for diagnostic purposes.