加压式余热蒸汽发生器联合循环电厂经济效益的确定

D. A. Khokhlov, Daria A. Khokhlova, K. V. Sterkhov, M. N. Zaichenko, Valeriya S. Likholetova
{"title":"加压式余热蒸汽发生器联合循环电厂经济效益的确定","authors":"D. A. Khokhlov, Daria A. Khokhlova, K. V. Sterkhov, M. N. Zaichenko, Valeriya S. Likholetova","doi":"10.1109/REEPE51337.2021.9387984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the economic efficiency study results for several modernization cases of existing power equipment. The modernization cases assume the Pressurized Heat Recovery Steam Generator (PHRSG) usage with the twostage gas turbine. The T-100 cogeneration steam turbine and the K-300 condensing steam turbine were selected as the modernization object. The modernization cases are carried out with the high-power SGT5-2000E gas turbine and low-power GT-25PA gas turbine. New combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant construction case is considered for comparison as an example of typical Russian modernization case. The main economic efficiency indicators were considered - net present value (NPV); internal rate of return (IRR); pay-back period – simple (PP) and discounted (DPP); profitability index (PI). The article shows that all cases are investment attractive, but each case has its own specifics.","PeriodicalId":272476,"journal":{"name":"2021 3rd International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economic Effect Determination for Combined Cycle Power Plant with Pressurized Heat Recovery Steam Generator\",\"authors\":\"D. A. Khokhlov, Daria A. Khokhlova, K. V. Sterkhov, M. N. Zaichenko, Valeriya S. Likholetova\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REEPE51337.2021.9387984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article describes the economic efficiency study results for several modernization cases of existing power equipment. The modernization cases assume the Pressurized Heat Recovery Steam Generator (PHRSG) usage with the twostage gas turbine. The T-100 cogeneration steam turbine and the K-300 condensing steam turbine were selected as the modernization object. The modernization cases are carried out with the high-power SGT5-2000E gas turbine and low-power GT-25PA gas turbine. New combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant construction case is considered for comparison as an example of typical Russian modernization case. The main economic efficiency indicators were considered - net present value (NPV); internal rate of return (IRR); pay-back period – simple (PP) and discounted (DPP); profitability index (PI). The article shows that all cases are investment attractive, but each case has its own specifics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 3rd International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 3rd International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE51337.2021.9387984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 3rd International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE51337.2021.9387984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了几个现有电力设备现代化改造案例的经济效益研究结果。现代化案例假设加压热回收蒸汽发生器(PHRSG)与两级燃气轮机一起使用。选择T-100热电联产汽轮机和K-300冷凝式汽轮机作为现代化改造对象。现代化案例使用大功率SGT5-2000E燃气轮机和小功率GT-25PA燃气轮机进行。将新型联合循环燃气轮机(CCGT)电厂建设案例作为典型的俄罗斯现代化案例进行比较。主要经济效率指标包括净现值(NPV);内部收益率;回收期-简单(PP)和贴现(DPP);盈利指数(PI)。文章表明,所有案例都具有投资吸引力,但每个案例都有自己的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Economic Effect Determination for Combined Cycle Power Plant with Pressurized Heat Recovery Steam Generator
The article describes the economic efficiency study results for several modernization cases of existing power equipment. The modernization cases assume the Pressurized Heat Recovery Steam Generator (PHRSG) usage with the twostage gas turbine. The T-100 cogeneration steam turbine and the K-300 condensing steam turbine were selected as the modernization object. The modernization cases are carried out with the high-power SGT5-2000E gas turbine and low-power GT-25PA gas turbine. New combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant construction case is considered for comparison as an example of typical Russian modernization case. The main economic efficiency indicators were considered - net present value (NPV); internal rate of return (IRR); pay-back period – simple (PP) and discounted (DPP); profitability index (PI). The article shows that all cases are investment attractive, but each case has its own specifics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信