自由活塞与传统曲轴发动机活塞环摩擦比较

M. Bade, N. Clark, T. Musho, P. Famouri
{"title":"自由活塞与传统曲轴发动机活塞环摩擦比较","authors":"M. Bade, N. Clark, T. Musho, P. Famouri","doi":"10.1115/ICEF2018-9774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional internal combustion engines driven by crankshafts and connecting rod mechanisms are restrained by combustion, thermal and mechanical inefficiencies. The Oscillating Free Piston Linear Engine Alternator (OFPLEA) produces electric power with no need to modify the reciprocating motion to rotary motion. In the most common geometry it consists of a linear alternator driven cyclically by one or two internal combustion engines. With the elimination of crankshaft mechanism linkages, the free piston engine offers potential benefits over crankshaft engines in terms of total mechanical losses. A significant proportion of 5% to 12% of total fuel energy in conventional engines is consumed to overcome the frictional losses. This research investigation addresses an analytical and numerical model to simulate the tribological performance of piston rings in an OFPLEA engine. The results are then compared with results from an equivalent conventional crankshaft driven engine. This axisymmetric, mixed lubrication tribological model is developed on the hydrodynamic process defined by Patir and Cheng’s modified Reynolds equation and an asperity contact process as defined by Greenwood and Tripp’s rough surface dry contact model. The asperity contact pressure distribution, hydrodynamic pressure distribution, lubricant oil film thickness, frictional force and frictional power losses are calculated using an explicit finite difference approach. In the absence of spring-dominated OFPLEA system, dissimilarity in the piston motion profile for compression and power stroke exhibited two different oil film thickness peaks. Whereas a similar oil film thickness peaks are observed for conventional engine due to the controlled and stable operation maintained by crankshaft mechanism. The simulation results state that the frictional losses due to piston ring - cylinder liner contact are found to be lower for a free piston engine than for those of a corresponding crankshaft engine. The simulated piston ring frictional power losses are found to be 342.8 W for the OFPLEA system and 382.6 W for the crankshaft engine. Further, an overall system efficiency improvement of 0.6 % is observed for an OFPLEA engine due to these reduced frictional losses from piston rings.","PeriodicalId":448421,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Emissions Control Systems; Instrumentation, Controls, and Hybrids; Numerical Simulation; Engine Design and Mechanical Development","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piston Rings Friction Comparison in a Free Piston and Conventional Crankshaft Engines\",\"authors\":\"M. Bade, N. Clark, T. Musho, P. Famouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/ICEF2018-9774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conventional internal combustion engines driven by crankshafts and connecting rod mechanisms are restrained by combustion, thermal and mechanical inefficiencies. The Oscillating Free Piston Linear Engine Alternator (OFPLEA) produces electric power with no need to modify the reciprocating motion to rotary motion. In the most common geometry it consists of a linear alternator driven cyclically by one or two internal combustion engines. With the elimination of crankshaft mechanism linkages, the free piston engine offers potential benefits over crankshaft engines in terms of total mechanical losses. A significant proportion of 5% to 12% of total fuel energy in conventional engines is consumed to overcome the frictional losses. This research investigation addresses an analytical and numerical model to simulate the tribological performance of piston rings in an OFPLEA engine. The results are then compared with results from an equivalent conventional crankshaft driven engine. This axisymmetric, mixed lubrication tribological model is developed on the hydrodynamic process defined by Patir and Cheng’s modified Reynolds equation and an asperity contact process as defined by Greenwood and Tripp’s rough surface dry contact model. The asperity contact pressure distribution, hydrodynamic pressure distribution, lubricant oil film thickness, frictional force and frictional power losses are calculated using an explicit finite difference approach. In the absence of spring-dominated OFPLEA system, dissimilarity in the piston motion profile for compression and power stroke exhibited two different oil film thickness peaks. Whereas a similar oil film thickness peaks are observed for conventional engine due to the controlled and stable operation maintained by crankshaft mechanism. The simulation results state that the frictional losses due to piston ring - cylinder liner contact are found to be lower for a free piston engine than for those of a corresponding crankshaft engine. The simulated piston ring frictional power losses are found to be 342.8 W for the OFPLEA system and 382.6 W for the crankshaft engine. Further, an overall system efficiency improvement of 0.6 % is observed for an OFPLEA engine due to these reduced frictional losses from piston rings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2: Emissions Control Systems; Instrumentation, Controls, and Hybrids; Numerical Simulation; Engine Design and Mechanical Development\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2: Emissions Control Systems; Instrumentation, Controls, and Hybrids; Numerical Simulation; Engine Design and Mechanical Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2018-9774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Emissions Control Systems; Instrumentation, Controls, and Hybrids; Numerical Simulation; Engine Design and Mechanical Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2018-9774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

传统的由曲轴和连杆机构驱动的内燃机受到燃烧、热和机械效率低下的限制。振荡自由活塞线性发动机交流发电机(OFPLEA)产生电力,无需将往复运动修改为旋转运动。在最常见的几何结构中,它由一个或两个内燃机循环驱动的线性交流发电机组成。由于消除了曲轴机构连接,自由活塞发动机在总机械损失方面比曲轴发动机具有潜在的优势。在传统发动机中,有5%到12%的总燃料能量被消耗在克服摩擦损失上。本文研究了一种模拟OFPLEA发动机活塞环摩擦学性能的分析和数值模型。然后将结果与等效的传统曲轴驱动发动机的结果进行比较。该轴对称混合润滑摩擦学模型是在Patir和Cheng的修正Reynolds方程定义的流体动力过程和Greenwood和Tripp的粗糙表面干接触模型定义的粗糙接触过程的基础上建立的。采用显式有限差分法计算了粗糙接触压力分布、动水压力分布、润滑油膜厚度、摩擦力和摩擦功率损失。在没有以弹簧为主的OFPLEA系统的情况下,活塞在压缩和动力行程中的运动曲线不同,表现出两个不同的油膜厚度峰值。而传统发动机由于曲轴机构的控制和稳定运行,也存在类似的油膜厚度峰值。仿真结果表明,活塞环与缸套接触的摩擦损失在自由活塞发动机中比在相应的曲轴发动机中要小。模拟的活塞环摩擦功率损失在OFPLEA系统为342.8 W,在曲轴发动机为382.6 W。此外,由于减少了活塞环的摩擦损失,OFPLEA发动机的整体系统效率提高了0.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Piston Rings Friction Comparison in a Free Piston and Conventional Crankshaft Engines
The conventional internal combustion engines driven by crankshafts and connecting rod mechanisms are restrained by combustion, thermal and mechanical inefficiencies. The Oscillating Free Piston Linear Engine Alternator (OFPLEA) produces electric power with no need to modify the reciprocating motion to rotary motion. In the most common geometry it consists of a linear alternator driven cyclically by one or two internal combustion engines. With the elimination of crankshaft mechanism linkages, the free piston engine offers potential benefits over crankshaft engines in terms of total mechanical losses. A significant proportion of 5% to 12% of total fuel energy in conventional engines is consumed to overcome the frictional losses. This research investigation addresses an analytical and numerical model to simulate the tribological performance of piston rings in an OFPLEA engine. The results are then compared with results from an equivalent conventional crankshaft driven engine. This axisymmetric, mixed lubrication tribological model is developed on the hydrodynamic process defined by Patir and Cheng’s modified Reynolds equation and an asperity contact process as defined by Greenwood and Tripp’s rough surface dry contact model. The asperity contact pressure distribution, hydrodynamic pressure distribution, lubricant oil film thickness, frictional force and frictional power losses are calculated using an explicit finite difference approach. In the absence of spring-dominated OFPLEA system, dissimilarity in the piston motion profile for compression and power stroke exhibited two different oil film thickness peaks. Whereas a similar oil film thickness peaks are observed for conventional engine due to the controlled and stable operation maintained by crankshaft mechanism. The simulation results state that the frictional losses due to piston ring - cylinder liner contact are found to be lower for a free piston engine than for those of a corresponding crankshaft engine. The simulated piston ring frictional power losses are found to be 342.8 W for the OFPLEA system and 382.6 W for the crankshaft engine. Further, an overall system efficiency improvement of 0.6 % is observed for an OFPLEA engine due to these reduced frictional losses from piston rings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信