分散鲁棒性

Stephen Chong, A. Myers
{"title":"分散鲁棒性","authors":"Stephen Chong, A. Myers","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.2006.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robustness links confidentiality and integrity properties of a computing system and has been identified as a useful property for characterizing and enforcing security. Previous characterizations of robustness have been with respect to a single idealized attacker; this paper shows how to define robustness for systems with mutual distrust. Further, we demonstrate that the decentralized label model (DLM) can be extended to support fine-grained reasoning about robustness in such systems. The DLM is a natural choice for capturing robustness requirements because decentralized labels are explicitly expressed in terms of principals that can be used to characterize the power of attackers across both the confidentiality and integrity axes. New rules are proposed for statically checking robustness and qualified robustness using an extended DLM; the resulting type system is shown to soundly enforce robustness. Finally, sound approximations are developed for checking programs with bounded but unknown label parameters, which is useful for security-typed languages. In sum, the paper shows how to use robustness to gain assurance about secure information flow and information release in systems with complex security requirements","PeriodicalId":131951,"journal":{"name":"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decentralized robustness\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Chong, A. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSFW.2006.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robustness links confidentiality and integrity properties of a computing system and has been identified as a useful property for characterizing and enforcing security. Previous characterizations of robustness have been with respect to a single idealized attacker; this paper shows how to define robustness for systems with mutual distrust. Further, we demonstrate that the decentralized label model (DLM) can be extended to support fine-grained reasoning about robustness in such systems. The DLM is a natural choice for capturing robustness requirements because decentralized labels are explicitly expressed in terms of principals that can be used to characterize the power of attackers across both the confidentiality and integrity axes. New rules are proposed for statically checking robustness and qualified robustness using an extended DLM; the resulting type system is shown to soundly enforce robustness. Finally, sound approximations are developed for checking programs with bounded but unknown label parameters, which is useful for security-typed languages. In sum, the paper shows how to use robustness to gain assurance about secure information flow and information release in systems with complex security requirements\",\"PeriodicalId\":131951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.2006.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.2006.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

鲁棒性将计算系统的机密性和完整性属性联系在一起,并且已被确定为描述和执行安全性的有用属性。以前对鲁棒性的描述都是针对单个理想化的攻击者;本文讨论了如何定义具有互不信任的系统的鲁棒性。此外,我们证明了分散标签模型(DLM)可以扩展到支持此类系统中关于鲁棒性的细粒度推理。DLM是捕获健壮性需求的自然选择,因为去中心化标签是用主体明确表示的,主体可用于描述攻击者在机密性和完整性方面的能力。提出了利用扩展DLM进行静态鲁棒性和合格鲁棒性检验的新规则;由此产生的类型系统可以很好地增强鲁棒性。最后,开发了声音近似来检查具有有界但未知的标签参数的程序,这对安全类型语言很有用。总之,本文展示了如何在具有复杂安全需求的系统中使用鲁棒性来获得安全信息流和信息发布的保证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decentralized robustness
Robustness links confidentiality and integrity properties of a computing system and has been identified as a useful property for characterizing and enforcing security. Previous characterizations of robustness have been with respect to a single idealized attacker; this paper shows how to define robustness for systems with mutual distrust. Further, we demonstrate that the decentralized label model (DLM) can be extended to support fine-grained reasoning about robustness in such systems. The DLM is a natural choice for capturing robustness requirements because decentralized labels are explicitly expressed in terms of principals that can be used to characterize the power of attackers across both the confidentiality and integrity axes. New rules are proposed for statically checking robustness and qualified robustness using an extended DLM; the resulting type system is shown to soundly enforce robustness. Finally, sound approximations are developed for checking programs with bounded but unknown label parameters, which is useful for security-typed languages. In sum, the paper shows how to use robustness to gain assurance about secure information flow and information release in systems with complex security requirements
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信