破产公司的持续经营意见:审计师依赖与意见购买

C. Lennox
{"title":"破产公司的持续经营意见:审计师依赖与意见购买","authors":"C. Lennox","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.240468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to public expectations, companies usually receive clean audit opinions shortly prior to failure. This study examines whether audit reports in failing companies are affected by auditor dependence or opinion shopping. I find audit fees, auditor size, auditor-client tenures and dominant directors are not significantly associated with going-concern opinions. This suggests audit reports are not affected by auditor dependence. I also find companies strategically appoint auditors who are less likely to issue going concern opinions. This suggests failing companies successfully engage in opinion shopping.","PeriodicalId":415084,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going-Concern Opinions in Failing Companies: Auditor Dependence and Opinion Shopping\",\"authors\":\"C. Lennox\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.240468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contrary to public expectations, companies usually receive clean audit opinions shortly prior to failure. This study examines whether audit reports in failing companies are affected by auditor dependence or opinion shopping. I find audit fees, auditor size, auditor-client tenures and dominant directors are not significantly associated with going-concern opinions. This suggests audit reports are not affected by auditor dependence. I also find companies strategically appoint auditors who are less likely to issue going concern opinions. This suggests failing companies successfully engage in opinion shopping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.240468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Finance & Corporate Governance Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.240468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

与公众的期望相反,公司通常会在破产前不久收到干净的审计意见。本研究探讨破产公司的审计报告是否受到审计师依赖或意见购物的影响。我发现审计费用、审计师规模、审计客户任期和主导董事与持续经营意见没有显著相关。这表明审计报告不受审计师依赖性的影响。我还发现,公司在战略上任命的审计师不太可能发表持续经营意见。这表明,失败的公司成功地进行了舆论购物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Going-Concern Opinions in Failing Companies: Auditor Dependence and Opinion Shopping
Contrary to public expectations, companies usually receive clean audit opinions shortly prior to failure. This study examines whether audit reports in failing companies are affected by auditor dependence or opinion shopping. I find audit fees, auditor size, auditor-client tenures and dominant directors are not significantly associated with going-concern opinions. This suggests audit reports are not affected by auditor dependence. I also find companies strategically appoint auditors who are less likely to issue going concern opinions. This suggests failing companies successfully engage in opinion shopping.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信