当代日本的放松管制与市场反应:行政指导、经连和主要银行

CIRJE F-Series Pub Date : 2004-03-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.593527
John M. Olin, Y. Miwa, J. Ramseyer, M. Ramseyer
{"title":"当代日本的放松管制与市场反应:行政指导、经连和主要银行","authors":"John M. Olin, Y. Miwa, J. Ramseyer, M. Ramseyer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.593527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Change is in the air in Japan, claim many observers: the government is radically deregulating crucial sectors of the economy, the large firms are unwinding their keiretsu corporate groups, and firms and banks are dismantling their main bank arrangements. Some observers see all three as exogenous institutional shocks, while others treat the last two as behavioral responses to the first. In fact, although the first phenomenon would constitute an institutional change if it occurred, it has not -- for Japanese bureaucrats had no substantial regulatory power to abandon. Although the last two would constitute market responses if they occurred, they have not either -- for firms and banks maintained no groups or main-bank arrangements to unwind or dismantle.","PeriodicalId":345004,"journal":{"name":"CIRJE F-Series","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deregulation and Market Response in Contemporary Japan : Administrative Guidance, Keiretsu, and Main Banks\",\"authors\":\"John M. Olin, Y. Miwa, J. Ramseyer, M. Ramseyer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.593527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Change is in the air in Japan, claim many observers: the government is radically deregulating crucial sectors of the economy, the large firms are unwinding their keiretsu corporate groups, and firms and banks are dismantling their main bank arrangements. Some observers see all three as exogenous institutional shocks, while others treat the last two as behavioral responses to the first. In fact, although the first phenomenon would constitute an institutional change if it occurred, it has not -- for Japanese bureaucrats had no substantial regulatory power to abandon. Although the last two would constitute market responses if they occurred, they have not either -- for firms and banks maintained no groups or main-bank arrangements to unwind or dismantle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIRJE F-Series\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIRJE F-Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.593527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIRJE F-Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.593527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

许多观察家声称,日本正在发生变化:政府正在从根本上放松对经济关键部门的管制,大公司正在解散其经连集团,公司和银行正在解散其主要的银行安排。一些观察人士认为这三种冲击都是外生的制度冲击,而另一些人则认为后两种冲击是对前一种冲击的行为反应。事实上,尽管第一种现象一旦发生,将构成一种制度变革,但它并没有——因为日本官僚没有实质性的监管权力可以放弃。尽管后两种情况如果发生,将构成市场反应,但它们也没有——因为企业和银行没有维持任何集团或主要银行安排来解除或拆除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deregulation and Market Response in Contemporary Japan : Administrative Guidance, Keiretsu, and Main Banks
Change is in the air in Japan, claim many observers: the government is radically deregulating crucial sectors of the economy, the large firms are unwinding their keiretsu corporate groups, and firms and banks are dismantling their main bank arrangements. Some observers see all three as exogenous institutional shocks, while others treat the last two as behavioral responses to the first. In fact, although the first phenomenon would constitute an institutional change if it occurred, it has not -- for Japanese bureaucrats had no substantial regulatory power to abandon. Although the last two would constitute market responses if they occurred, they have not either -- for firms and banks maintained no groups or main-bank arrangements to unwind or dismantle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信