多层次反恐治理与法治——欧洲共同体法院对卡迪诉理事会案的判决

Márton Varju
{"title":"多层次反恐治理与法治——欧洲共同体法院对卡迪诉理事会案的判决","authors":"Márton Varju","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1595952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent resurgence of international terrorism has imposed a difficult challenge on States where public power is democratically legitimated and where the rule of law prevails. Many States have created specific legal provisions, so called emergency laws, for the fight against contemporary terrorism giving extra powers to State bodies. These laws intruding into the private spheres of individuals and their organizations were often based on obligations in international law. The anti-terrorism resolutions of the UN Security Council, while leaving considerable room for implementation on the State level, determined unquestionably the duties of States in the fight against global terrorism.The main question addressed in this paper is whether multi-level systems of governance may rely on innovative concepts and solutions which appeared in the new constitutionalism discourse in order to ensure the legality of measures adopted on different levels within the system. Basically, a multi-level system may ensure compliance with the rule of law by ensuring and enhancing open intra-systemic communication among the levels of governance, the levels being able to correct the constitutional shortcomings of the other levels, by means of which the legality of measures will depend on the constitutionality of the system as a whole. Conversely, the constitutional functioning of multi-level systems may require the levels to impose full constitutional requirements independently without relying on the constitutional safeguards offered on the other levels of governance. In the case law of Community Courts this dilemma manifested in the question whether the constitutional safeguards available to the individuals affected should be guaranteed on the European Union level to a full extent or the constitutional safeguards should be guaranteed in cooperation with the other levels of governance joined together in the multi-level system of global anti-terrorism governance.","PeriodicalId":172026,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Level Anti-Terrorism Governance and the Rule of Law - The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the Y.A. Kadi v. Council Case\",\"authors\":\"Márton Varju\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1595952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent resurgence of international terrorism has imposed a difficult challenge on States where public power is democratically legitimated and where the rule of law prevails. Many States have created specific legal provisions, so called emergency laws, for the fight against contemporary terrorism giving extra powers to State bodies. These laws intruding into the private spheres of individuals and their organizations were often based on obligations in international law. The anti-terrorism resolutions of the UN Security Council, while leaving considerable room for implementation on the State level, determined unquestionably the duties of States in the fight against global terrorism.The main question addressed in this paper is whether multi-level systems of governance may rely on innovative concepts and solutions which appeared in the new constitutionalism discourse in order to ensure the legality of measures adopted on different levels within the system. Basically, a multi-level system may ensure compliance with the rule of law by ensuring and enhancing open intra-systemic communication among the levels of governance, the levels being able to correct the constitutional shortcomings of the other levels, by means of which the legality of measures will depend on the constitutionality of the system as a whole. Conversely, the constitutional functioning of multi-level systems may require the levels to impose full constitutional requirements independently without relying on the constitutional safeguards offered on the other levels of governance. In the case law of Community Courts this dilemma manifested in the question whether the constitutional safeguards available to the individuals affected should be guaranteed on the European Union level to a full extent or the constitutional safeguards should be guaranteed in cooperation with the other levels of governance joined together in the multi-level system of global anti-terrorism governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1595952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Comparative Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1595952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近国际恐怖主义的死灰复燃给公共权力民主合法化和法治盛行的国家带来了困难的挑战。许多国家为打击当代恐怖主义制定了具体的法律规定,即所谓的紧急状态法,赋予国家机构额外的权力。这些侵犯个人及其组织私人领域的法律往往是以国际法中的义务为基础的。联合国安理会的反恐决议虽然在国家层面留下了相当大的执行空间,但毫无疑问地确定了各国在打击全球恐怖主义方面的责任。本文探讨的主要问题是,多层次的治理体系是否可以依赖于新宪政话语中出现的创新理念和解决方案,以确保在体系内不同层面采取的措施的合法性。基本上,一个多层次的系统可以通过确保和加强各级治理之间的公开的系统内沟通来确保遵守法治,各级治理能够纠正其他各级的宪法缺陷,通过这种方式,措施的合法性将取决于整个系统的合宪性。相反,多层次系统的宪政功能可能要求各级独立地施加充分的宪法要求,而不依赖于其他各级治理所提供的宪法保障。在共同体法院的判例法中,这一困境表现在是否应在欧盟层面上充分保障受影响的个人可获得的宪法保障,还是应在全球反恐治理的多层次体系中与联合在一起的其他治理层面合作保障宪法保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Level Anti-Terrorism Governance and the Rule of Law - The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the Y.A. Kadi v. Council Case
The recent resurgence of international terrorism has imposed a difficult challenge on States where public power is democratically legitimated and where the rule of law prevails. Many States have created specific legal provisions, so called emergency laws, for the fight against contemporary terrorism giving extra powers to State bodies. These laws intruding into the private spheres of individuals and their organizations were often based on obligations in international law. The anti-terrorism resolutions of the UN Security Council, while leaving considerable room for implementation on the State level, determined unquestionably the duties of States in the fight against global terrorism.The main question addressed in this paper is whether multi-level systems of governance may rely on innovative concepts and solutions which appeared in the new constitutionalism discourse in order to ensure the legality of measures adopted on different levels within the system. Basically, a multi-level system may ensure compliance with the rule of law by ensuring and enhancing open intra-systemic communication among the levels of governance, the levels being able to correct the constitutional shortcomings of the other levels, by means of which the legality of measures will depend on the constitutionality of the system as a whole. Conversely, the constitutional functioning of multi-level systems may require the levels to impose full constitutional requirements independently without relying on the constitutional safeguards offered on the other levels of governance. In the case law of Community Courts this dilemma manifested in the question whether the constitutional safeguards available to the individuals affected should be guaranteed on the European Union level to a full extent or the constitutional safeguards should be guaranteed in cooperation with the other levels of governance joined together in the multi-level system of global anti-terrorism governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信