{"title":"移民国家承认主权和生殖正义的侵蚀","authors":"Krista Benson","doi":"10.1353/ado.0.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I outline the importance of Reproductive Justice framing in understanding the broader impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and its impacts on adoption and foster care. From there, I explore another Supreme Court decision, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022), and its potential impact on Haaland v. Brackeen, a case that represents an explicit challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 which will be heard by the US Supreme Court in fall 2022.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erosions of Settler State Recognition of Sovereignty and Reproductive Justice\",\"authors\":\"Krista Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ado.0.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, I outline the importance of Reproductive Justice framing in understanding the broader impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and its impacts on adoption and foster care. From there, I explore another Supreme Court decision, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022), and its potential impact on Haaland v. Brackeen, a case that represents an explicit challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 which will be heard by the US Supreme Court in fall 2022.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Erosions of Settler State Recognition of Sovereignty and Reproductive Justice
In this essay, I outline the importance of Reproductive Justice framing in understanding the broader impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and its impacts on adoption and foster care. From there, I explore another Supreme Court decision, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022), and its potential impact on Haaland v. Brackeen, a case that represents an explicit challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 which will be heard by the US Supreme Court in fall 2022.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
