网络安全中的人为因素:系统文献综述

Rohani Rohan, Suree Funilkul, Debajyoti Pal, W. Chutimaskul
{"title":"网络安全中的人为因素:系统文献综述","authors":"Rohani Rohan, Suree Funilkul, Debajyoti Pal, W. Chutimaskul","doi":"10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cybersecurity is paramount for all public and private sectors for protecting their information systems, data, and digital assets from cyber-attacks; thus, relying on technology-based protections alone will not achieve this goal. This work examines the role of human factors in cybersecurity by looking at the top-tier conference on Human Factors in Cybersecurity over the past 6 years. A total of 24 articles were selected for the final analysis. Findings show that most of the authors used a quantitative method, where survey was the most used tool for collecting the data, and less attention has been paid to the theoretical research. Besides, three types of users were identified: university-level users, organizational-level users, and unspecified users. Culture is another less investigated aspect, and the samples were biased towards the western community. Moreover, 17 human factors are identified; human awareness, privacy perception, trust perception, behavior, and capability are the top five among them. Also, new insights and recommendations are presented.","PeriodicalId":211704,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding of Human Factors in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Rohani Rohan, Suree Funilkul, Debajyoti Pal, W. Chutimaskul\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cybersecurity is paramount for all public and private sectors for protecting their information systems, data, and digital assets from cyber-attacks; thus, relying on technology-based protections alone will not achieve this goal. This work examines the role of human factors in cybersecurity by looking at the top-tier conference on Human Factors in Cybersecurity over the past 6 years. A total of 24 articles were selected for the final analysis. Findings show that most of the authors used a quantitative method, where survey was the most used tool for collecting the data, and less attention has been paid to the theoretical research. Besides, three types of users were identified: university-level users, organizational-level users, and unspecified users. Culture is another less investigated aspect, and the samples were biased towards the western community. Moreover, 17 human factors are identified; human awareness, privacy perception, trust perception, behavior, and capability are the top five among them. Also, new insights and recommendations are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

网络安全对于所有公共和私营部门保护其信息系统、数据和数字资产免受网络攻击至关重要;因此,仅依靠基于技术的保护将无法实现这一目标。本研究通过回顾过去6年网络安全中的人为因素顶级会议,考察了人为因素在网络安全中的作用。最终选取了24篇文章进行分析。研究结果表明,大多数作者采用定量方法,调查是收集数据的最常用工具,对理论研究的关注较少。此外,还确定了三种类型的用户:校级用户、组织级用户和未指定用户。文化是另一个较少调查的方面,样本偏向于西方社区。此外,还确定了17个人为因素;其中,人的意识、隐私感知、信任感知、行为和能力排在前五位。此外,还提出了新的见解和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding of Human Factors in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review
Cybersecurity is paramount for all public and private sectors for protecting their information systems, data, and digital assets from cyber-attacks; thus, relying on technology-based protections alone will not achieve this goal. This work examines the role of human factors in cybersecurity by looking at the top-tier conference on Human Factors in Cybersecurity over the past 6 years. A total of 24 articles were selected for the final analysis. Findings show that most of the authors used a quantitative method, where survey was the most used tool for collecting the data, and less attention has been paid to the theoretical research. Besides, three types of users were identified: university-level users, organizational-level users, and unspecified users. Culture is another less investigated aspect, and the samples were biased towards the western community. Moreover, 17 human factors are identified; human awareness, privacy perception, trust perception, behavior, and capability are the top five among them. Also, new insights and recommendations are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信