十字架有多空?

S. M. Heim
{"title":"十字架有多空?","authors":"S. M. Heim","doi":"10.1515/9780823294374-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the extent to which the cross and Christ’s redemptive suffering in it are paradigmatic for Christian life. It does so though a comparative consideration of the bodhisattva path and the Christ/disciple path. Sympathetic Buddhist readings of the cross suggest three different kinds of emptiness are in play: no-self emptiness, Buddha nature emptiness, and conventional or samsaric emptiness. Reflection on these, and comparison and contrast with their role in the bodhisattva path, deepen a Christian theological understanding of the respects in which the cross is an exemplary realization and the respects in which its non-exemplary character is crucial to its salvific role.","PeriodicalId":195231,"journal":{"name":"Atonement and Comparative Theology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Empty Is the Cross?\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Heim\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9780823294374-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay explores the extent to which the cross and Christ’s redemptive suffering in it are paradigmatic for Christian life. It does so though a comparative consideration of the bodhisattva path and the Christ/disciple path. Sympathetic Buddhist readings of the cross suggest three different kinds of emptiness are in play: no-self emptiness, Buddha nature emptiness, and conventional or samsaric emptiness. Reflection on these, and comparison and contrast with their role in the bodhisattva path, deepen a Christian theological understanding of the respects in which the cross is an exemplary realization and the respects in which its non-exemplary character is crucial to its salvific role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":195231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atonement and Comparative Theology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atonement and Comparative Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823294374-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atonement and Comparative Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823294374-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了十字架和基督救赎的苦难在多大程度上是基督徒生活的典范。它通过对菩萨之路和基督/门徒之路的比较考虑来做到这一点。佛教对十字架的同情解读表明,有三种不同的空在起作用:无我空、佛性空、传统空或轮回空。对这些问题进行反思,并与它们在菩萨道路上的作用进行比较和对比,加深了基督教神学对十字架的理解,在这些方面,十字架是一种示范性的实现,而在这些方面,它的非示范性对它的救赎作用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Empty Is the Cross?
This essay explores the extent to which the cross and Christ’s redemptive suffering in it are paradigmatic for Christian life. It does so though a comparative consideration of the bodhisattva path and the Christ/disciple path. Sympathetic Buddhist readings of the cross suggest three different kinds of emptiness are in play: no-self emptiness, Buddha nature emptiness, and conventional or samsaric emptiness. Reflection on these, and comparison and contrast with their role in the bodhisattva path, deepen a Christian theological understanding of the respects in which the cross is an exemplary realization and the respects in which its non-exemplary character is crucial to its salvific role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信