{"title":"十字架有多空?","authors":"S. M. Heim","doi":"10.1515/9780823294374-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the extent to which the cross and Christ’s redemptive suffering in it are paradigmatic for Christian life. It does so though a comparative consideration of the bodhisattva path and the Christ/disciple path. Sympathetic Buddhist readings of the cross suggest three different kinds of emptiness are in play: no-self emptiness, Buddha nature emptiness, and conventional or samsaric emptiness. Reflection on these, and comparison and contrast with their role in the bodhisattva path, deepen a Christian theological understanding of the respects in which the cross is an exemplary realization and the respects in which its non-exemplary character is crucial to its salvific role.","PeriodicalId":195231,"journal":{"name":"Atonement and Comparative Theology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Empty Is the Cross?\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Heim\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9780823294374-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay explores the extent to which the cross and Christ’s redemptive suffering in it are paradigmatic for Christian life. It does so though a comparative consideration of the bodhisattva path and the Christ/disciple path. Sympathetic Buddhist readings of the cross suggest three different kinds of emptiness are in play: no-self emptiness, Buddha nature emptiness, and conventional or samsaric emptiness. Reflection on these, and comparison and contrast with their role in the bodhisattva path, deepen a Christian theological understanding of the respects in which the cross is an exemplary realization and the respects in which its non-exemplary character is crucial to its salvific role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":195231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atonement and Comparative Theology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atonement and Comparative Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823294374-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atonement and Comparative Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823294374-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay explores the extent to which the cross and Christ’s redemptive suffering in it are paradigmatic for Christian life. It does so though a comparative consideration of the bodhisattva path and the Christ/disciple path. Sympathetic Buddhist readings of the cross suggest three different kinds of emptiness are in play: no-self emptiness, Buddha nature emptiness, and conventional or samsaric emptiness. Reflection on these, and comparison and contrast with their role in the bodhisattva path, deepen a Christian theological understanding of the respects in which the cross is an exemplary realization and the respects in which its non-exemplary character is crucial to its salvific role.