拉脱维亚信息和通信技术术语形成的半算法方法

Dace Šostaka, Juris Borzovs, Eduards Cauna, Iveta Keisa, Marcis Pinnis, A. Vasiljevs
{"title":"拉脱维亚信息和通信技术术语形成的半算法方法","authors":"Dace Šostaka, Juris Borzovs, Eduards Cauna, Iveta Keisa, Marcis Pinnis, A. Vasiljevs","doi":"10.22364/bjmc.2023.11.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Information and Communication Technology terms are mainly formed in English and then secondary–formed in other languages. Because of the differences in the morphological and term–formation traditions in various languages, the results of secondary term formation tend to be somewhat chaotic. Latvia’s Information and Communication Technology terminologists and linguists have developed a rather rigorous, semi–algorithmic approach to term formation that has been approbated for over thirty years. This paper aims to describe this approach and show its viability on an example of the most commonly used terms. We also analyse the usage of the officially approved terms in texts and the possible reasons why they sometimes encounter resistance from everyday users. In conclusion, we summarise the research regarding the current situation in the secondary ICT terminology in Latvian and provide insight into possibilities for further development.","PeriodicalId":431209,"journal":{"name":"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Semi-Algorithmic Approach to Formation of Latvian Information and Communication Technology Terms\",\"authors\":\"Dace Šostaka, Juris Borzovs, Eduards Cauna, Iveta Keisa, Marcis Pinnis, A. Vasiljevs\",\"doi\":\"10.22364/bjmc.2023.11.1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Information and Communication Technology terms are mainly formed in English and then secondary–formed in other languages. Because of the differences in the morphological and term–formation traditions in various languages, the results of secondary term formation tend to be somewhat chaotic. Latvia’s Information and Communication Technology terminologists and linguists have developed a rather rigorous, semi–algorithmic approach to term formation that has been approbated for over thirty years. This paper aims to describe this approach and show its viability on an example of the most commonly used terms. We also analyse the usage of the officially approved terms in texts and the possible reasons why they sometimes encounter resistance from everyday users. In conclusion, we summarise the research regarding the current situation in the secondary ICT terminology in Latvian and provide insight into possibilities for further development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2023.11.1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balt. J. Mod. Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2023.11.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Semi-Algorithmic Approach to Formation of Latvian Information and Communication Technology Terms
. Information and Communication Technology terms are mainly formed in English and then secondary–formed in other languages. Because of the differences in the morphological and term–formation traditions in various languages, the results of secondary term formation tend to be somewhat chaotic. Latvia’s Information and Communication Technology terminologists and linguists have developed a rather rigorous, semi–algorithmic approach to term formation that has been approbated for over thirty years. This paper aims to describe this approach and show its viability on an example of the most commonly used terms. We also analyse the usage of the officially approved terms in texts and the possible reasons why they sometimes encounter resistance from everyday users. In conclusion, we summarise the research regarding the current situation in the secondary ICT terminology in Latvian and provide insight into possibilities for further development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信