《可兰经》的语法问题结合注释及其影响的意义:一个关键的研究评论年代ū鼠al-Nisāʾ

Yehudit Dror
{"title":"《可兰经》的语法问题结合注释及其影响的意义:一个关键的研究评论年代ū鼠al-Nisāʾ","authors":"Yehudit Dror","doi":"10.1163/22321969-12340062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study focuses on the grammatical content of six Quranic exegeses dating from the fourth/tenth to the seventh/thirteenth centuries (see section 1.3). The idea of exploring grammatical aspects of Quranic exegeses is not new in modern research, yet a complete analysis based on a large corpus devoted to the collection, classification, and analysis of the grammatical content of Quranic exegeses is still lacking. This study is limited to an examination of commentaries on sūrat al-nisāʾ. In these, two types of grammatical comments can be distinguished. The first are “formal comments”, in which the commentators conduct a morphological and/or syntactical analysis of various components. Such comments usually include an explicit grammatical term, and most of these have been addressed by traditional grammarians. The second type are “functional comments”. These concern issues that are less common in classical grammatical descriptions, such as agreement, coherence, pragmatics, and other related matters. Usually in these types of comments, no syntactical term is mentioned, although such explanations make important grammatical contributions.","PeriodicalId":166367,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grammatical Issues Integrated with Quranic Exegesis and Their Impact on Meaning: A Critical Study of the Commentary on Sūrat al-Nisāʾ\",\"authors\":\"Yehudit Dror\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22321969-12340062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis study focuses on the grammatical content of six Quranic exegeses dating from the fourth/tenth to the seventh/thirteenth centuries (see section 1.3). The idea of exploring grammatical aspects of Quranic exegeses is not new in modern research, yet a complete analysis based on a large corpus devoted to the collection, classification, and analysis of the grammatical content of Quranic exegeses is still lacking. This study is limited to an examination of commentaries on sūrat al-nisāʾ. In these, two types of grammatical comments can be distinguished. The first are “formal comments”, in which the commentators conduct a morphological and/or syntactical analysis of various components. Such comments usually include an explicit grammatical term, and most of these have been addressed by traditional grammarians. The second type are “functional comments”. These concern issues that are less common in classical grammatical descriptions, such as agreement, coherence, pragmatics, and other related matters. Usually in these types of comments, no syntactical term is mentioned, although such explanations make important grammatical contributions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bayān – Journal of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的重点是四/十世纪到七/十三世纪的六部《古兰经》注释的语法内容(见1.3节)。在现代研究中,探索《古兰经》训诂学语法方面的思想并不新鲜,但基于大量语料库对《古兰经》训诂学的语法内容进行收集、分类和分析的完整分析仍然缺乏。这项研究仅限于对sūrat al- nisal - nisa - nah的评论的审查。其中,可以区分出两种类型的语法注释。第一种是“正式评论”,在这种评论中,评论员对各种成分进行形态和/或句法分析。这样的评论通常包括一个明确的语法术语,其中大多数已经由传统的语法学家解决了。第二种类型是“功能注释”。这些涉及在经典语法描述中不太常见的问题,如一致性、连贯性、语用学和其他相关问题。通常在这些类型的评论中,没有提到语法术语,尽管这些解释在语法上做出了重要的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grammatical Issues Integrated with Quranic Exegesis and Their Impact on Meaning: A Critical Study of the Commentary on Sūrat al-Nisāʾ
This study focuses on the grammatical content of six Quranic exegeses dating from the fourth/tenth to the seventh/thirteenth centuries (see section 1.3). The idea of exploring grammatical aspects of Quranic exegeses is not new in modern research, yet a complete analysis based on a large corpus devoted to the collection, classification, and analysis of the grammatical content of Quranic exegeses is still lacking. This study is limited to an examination of commentaries on sūrat al-nisāʾ. In these, two types of grammatical comments can be distinguished. The first are “formal comments”, in which the commentators conduct a morphological and/or syntactical analysis of various components. Such comments usually include an explicit grammatical term, and most of these have been addressed by traditional grammarians. The second type are “functional comments”. These concern issues that are less common in classical grammatical descriptions, such as agreement, coherence, pragmatics, and other related matters. Usually in these types of comments, no syntactical term is mentioned, although such explanations make important grammatical contributions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信