正义与法律:百年法则

William P. Quigley
{"title":"正义与法律:百年法则","authors":"William P. Quigley","doi":"10.31641/CLR150101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author suggests a rule of thumb to use in the debate over law versus justice: laws are transient creations of man, while justice is eternal. The lack of women’s suffrage, wide-spread racial segregation, and other facts of daily life a hundred years ago were perfectly legal but are now viewed as intolerably unjust anachronisms of history. The author hopes that a hundred years from now the death penalty, economic inequality, homelessness and other social problems existing under our current legal system will similarly be viewed as historically unfathomable offenses against justice.","PeriodicalId":220741,"journal":{"name":"City University of New York Law Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justice and Law: The One Hundred Year Rule\",\"authors\":\"William P. Quigley\",\"doi\":\"10.31641/CLR150101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author suggests a rule of thumb to use in the debate over law versus justice: laws are transient creations of man, while justice is eternal. The lack of women’s suffrage, wide-spread racial segregation, and other facts of daily life a hundred years ago were perfectly legal but are now viewed as intolerably unjust anachronisms of history. The author hopes that a hundred years from now the death penalty, economic inequality, homelessness and other social problems existing under our current legal system will similarly be viewed as historically unfathomable offenses against justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"City University of New York Law Review\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"City University of New York Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31641/CLR150101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City University of New York Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31641/CLR150101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法律与正义的争论中,作者提出了一条经验法则:法律是人类短暂的创造,而正义是永恒的。100年前,妇女选举权的缺乏、种族隔离的广泛存在以及其他日常生活的事实都是完全合法的,但现在却被视为不可容忍的不公正的历史错误。作者希望,从现在起一百年后,我们现行法律制度下存在的死刑、经济不平等、无家可归和其他社会问题同样会被视为历史上深不可测度的反正义罪行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justice and Law: The One Hundred Year Rule
The author suggests a rule of thumb to use in the debate over law versus justice: laws are transient creations of man, while justice is eternal. The lack of women’s suffrage, wide-spread racial segregation, and other facts of daily life a hundred years ago were perfectly legal but are now viewed as intolerably unjust anachronisms of history. The author hopes that a hundred years from now the death penalty, economic inequality, homelessness and other social problems existing under our current legal system will similarly be viewed as historically unfathomable offenses against justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信