电信Morpho的敏捷方法论

Tiago F Alwes de Olivei
{"title":"电信Morpho的敏捷方法论","authors":"Tiago F Alwes de Olivei","doi":"10.37082/ijirmps.2020.v08i04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is winding up clear, not minimum from the pages of this distribution, that lithe advancement strategies are being embraced or possibly considered by a developing number of programming improvement groups and associations. Regardless of whether you are as of now a functioning specialist coordinated advancement, or thinking about its appropriation on your venture, you will know about the business benefits that can be determined through quicker and increasingly powerful programming conveyance also the persuasive effect it can have on improvement groups[1]. On the other hand, possibly you work for a substantial association that presently cannot seem to make any genuine advances into dexterous improvement and are left considering how deftness could be made to chip away at a vast scale. In case you're in the last camp, or regardless of whether you are not effectively thinking about spry improvement in that capacity but rather are attempting to convey expansive and/or complex projects utilizing customary methodologies and wishing there was a superior way, at that point you are most likely where British Telecom (BT) wound up in 2004. [2]That was previously the landing in the organization of another CIO who methodically started supplanting the organization's long-standing cascadebased conveyance forms with one that encapsulated the key standards of nimble conveyance. This article shows a review of the methodology taken by BT, outlining how light-footed advancement standards can be connected effectively at the venture level. Obviously, the methodology taken by BT is not for the timid – it has incorporated a high level of hazard, and surely a great deal of torment. Presently very much into its second year be that as it may, even though the change is a long way from finish, it is as of now paying profits.","PeriodicalId":246139,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Agile Methodology at Telecommunications Morpho\",\"authors\":\"Tiago F Alwes de Olivei\",\"doi\":\"10.37082/ijirmps.2020.v08i04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is winding up clear, not minimum from the pages of this distribution, that lithe advancement strategies are being embraced or possibly considered by a developing number of programming improvement groups and associations. Regardless of whether you are as of now a functioning specialist coordinated advancement, or thinking about its appropriation on your venture, you will know about the business benefits that can be determined through quicker and increasingly powerful programming conveyance also the persuasive effect it can have on improvement groups[1]. On the other hand, possibly you work for a substantial association that presently cannot seem to make any genuine advances into dexterous improvement and are left considering how deftness could be made to chip away at a vast scale. In case you're in the last camp, or regardless of whether you are not effectively thinking about spry improvement in that capacity but rather are attempting to convey expansive and/or complex projects utilizing customary methodologies and wishing there was a superior way, at that point you are most likely where British Telecom (BT) wound up in 2004. [2]That was previously the landing in the organization of another CIO who methodically started supplanting the organization's long-standing cascadebased conveyance forms with one that encapsulated the key standards of nimble conveyance. This article shows a review of the methodology taken by BT, outlining how light-footed advancement standards can be connected effectively at the venture level. Obviously, the methodology taken by BT is not for the timid – it has incorporated a high level of hazard, and surely a great deal of torment. Presently very much into its second year be that as it may, even though the change is a long way from finish, it is as of now paying profits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37082/ijirmps.2020.v08i04.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37082/ijirmps.2020.v08i04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从本发行版的页面中可以清楚地看到,越来越多的方案拟订改进小组和协会正在接受或可能正在考虑这些改进战略。无论您现在是协调发展的功能专家,还是考虑将其用于您的企业,您都将了解通过更快且日益强大的编程传输可以确定的业务利益,以及它对改进小组的说服作用[1]。另一方面,可能你在为一个实质性的协会工作,而这个协会目前似乎无法在灵巧性的改进方面取得任何真正的进展,只能考虑如何在很大程度上使灵巧性逐渐消失。如果您属于最后一个阵营,或者无论您是否没有有效地考虑能力的快速改进,而是试图利用习惯的方法来传达扩展和/或复杂的项目,并希望有更好的方法,那么您很可能就是2004年英国电信(BT)的结局。[2]之前,另一位首席信息官在组织中着陆,他有条不紊地开始用一种包含灵活传递关键标准的方式取代组织中长期存在的基于级联的传递形式。本文回顾了英国电信采用的方法,概述了如何在风险层面上有效地连接轻快的进步标准。显然,英国电信采取的方法不适合胆小的人——它包含了很高的风险,当然也带来了很大的痛苦。现在已经进入了它的第二年,尽管它离完成还有很长的路要走,但它现在已经开始盈利了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Agile Methodology at Telecommunications Morpho
It is winding up clear, not minimum from the pages of this distribution, that lithe advancement strategies are being embraced or possibly considered by a developing number of programming improvement groups and associations. Regardless of whether you are as of now a functioning specialist coordinated advancement, or thinking about its appropriation on your venture, you will know about the business benefits that can be determined through quicker and increasingly powerful programming conveyance also the persuasive effect it can have on improvement groups[1]. On the other hand, possibly you work for a substantial association that presently cannot seem to make any genuine advances into dexterous improvement and are left considering how deftness could be made to chip away at a vast scale. In case you're in the last camp, or regardless of whether you are not effectively thinking about spry improvement in that capacity but rather are attempting to convey expansive and/or complex projects utilizing customary methodologies and wishing there was a superior way, at that point you are most likely where British Telecom (BT) wound up in 2004. [2]That was previously the landing in the organization of another CIO who methodically started supplanting the organization's long-standing cascadebased conveyance forms with one that encapsulated the key standards of nimble conveyance. This article shows a review of the methodology taken by BT, outlining how light-footed advancement standards can be connected effectively at the venture level. Obviously, the methodology taken by BT is not for the timid – it has incorporated a high level of hazard, and surely a great deal of torment. Presently very much into its second year be that as it may, even though the change is a long way from finish, it is as of now paying profits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信