从认知语言学角度分析“问”的概念结构Ānic

Hebm Gaballa
{"title":"从认知语言学角度分析“问”的概念结构Ānic","authors":"Hebm Gaballa","doi":"10.4314/%U.V23I1.%C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project attempts to provide one cognitive, that is, schematic, network of all occurrences of the Qurʔānic saʔala \"ask.\" The theoretical framework to argue for the proposed network is dual: to argue for a number of pragmatic functions that seem to underlie the choice of saʔala; and to make a strong case that these pragmatic functions motivate cognitive interpretation. The paper, which initially examines distinct interpretations of Qurʔānic saʔala that ensue from a contextual analysis of its occurrences, reveals these pragmatic functions: ṭalab \"request,\" ʔistifsār \"enquiry,\" muħāsaba \"interrogation,\" ʔistifzāz \"aggravation,\" ʔiṭmiʔnān \"concern about well-being,\" tawbīx \"reproach,\" tabkīt \"rebuke,\" taqrīr \"attestation\" and duʕāʔ \"prayer.\" Based on this pragmatic and other related syntactic evidence, it argues that \"ask\" cognitively frames, not two, but three central types of cognitively-based construal: information-seeking \"ask,\" performative \"ask\" and interrogating \"ask.\" The paper proposes some conceptual structures trigger some various utilizations of Qurʔānic \"ask;\" and argues that they all interlink into one schematic network that enables readers, translators and interpreters of the Holy Qurʔān to account, in a natural manner, for the verb's execution of these pragmatic functions. Finally, the findings and their theoretical implications are outlined. Keywords : Arabic linguistics, cognitive semantics, linguistic pragmatics & Qurʔānic interpretation & translation","PeriodicalId":411071,"journal":{"name":"Marang: Journal of Language and Literature","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual Structures of QurʔĀnic SaʔAla ‘Ask’: An Analysis from Cognitive Linguistics\",\"authors\":\"Hebm Gaballa\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/%U.V23I1.%C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This project attempts to provide one cognitive, that is, schematic, network of all occurrences of the Qurʔānic saʔala \\\"ask.\\\" The theoretical framework to argue for the proposed network is dual: to argue for a number of pragmatic functions that seem to underlie the choice of saʔala; and to make a strong case that these pragmatic functions motivate cognitive interpretation. The paper, which initially examines distinct interpretations of Qurʔānic saʔala that ensue from a contextual analysis of its occurrences, reveals these pragmatic functions: ṭalab \\\"request,\\\" ʔistifsār \\\"enquiry,\\\" muħāsaba \\\"interrogation,\\\" ʔistifzāz \\\"aggravation,\\\" ʔiṭmiʔnān \\\"concern about well-being,\\\" tawbīx \\\"reproach,\\\" tabkīt \\\"rebuke,\\\" taqrīr \\\"attestation\\\" and duʕāʔ \\\"prayer.\\\" Based on this pragmatic and other related syntactic evidence, it argues that \\\"ask\\\" cognitively frames, not two, but three central types of cognitively-based construal: information-seeking \\\"ask,\\\" performative \\\"ask\\\" and interrogating \\\"ask.\\\" The paper proposes some conceptual structures trigger some various utilizations of Qurʔānic \\\"ask;\\\" and argues that they all interlink into one schematic network that enables readers, translators and interpreters of the Holy Qurʔān to account, in a natural manner, for the verb's execution of these pragmatic functions. Finally, the findings and their theoretical implications are outlined. Keywords : Arabic linguistics, cognitive semantics, linguistic pragmatics & Qurʔānic interpretation & translation\",\"PeriodicalId\":411071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marang: Journal of Language and Literature\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marang: Journal of Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/%U.V23I1.%C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marang: Journal of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/%U.V23I1.%C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个项目试图提供一个认知,也就是,古兰经的所有出现的示意图,网络ānic sa阿拉“问”。支持这一网络的理论框架是双重的:一是支持一些语用功能,这些功能似乎是选择sa / ala的基础;并证明这些语用功能激发了认知解释。本文首先考察了对古兰经的不同解释,这些解释源于对其出现的语境分析,揭示了这些语用功能:ṭalab“请求”,“istifsār”询问,“muħāsaba”审讯,“istifzāz”愤怒,“iṭmi“nān”关心福祉,“tawb x”责备,“tabk t”责备,“taqr r”证明”和“du uh ā eh”祈祷。基于这种语用学和其他相关的句法证据,它认为“问”的认知框架,不是两种,而是三种核心类型的基于认知的解释:信息寻求的“问”,行为的“问”和询问的“问”。本文提出了一些概念结构触发了古兰经的一些不同的用途ānic“问”,并认为它们都相互联系成一个示意图网络,使读者,翻译和解释神圣的古兰经ān的译者,以一种自然的方式来解释动词执行这些语用功能。最后,概述了研究结果及其理论意义。关键词:阿拉伯语语言学;认知语义学;语言语用学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual Structures of QurʔĀnic SaʔAla ‘Ask’: An Analysis from Cognitive Linguistics
This project attempts to provide one cognitive, that is, schematic, network of all occurrences of the Qurʔānic saʔala "ask." The theoretical framework to argue for the proposed network is dual: to argue for a number of pragmatic functions that seem to underlie the choice of saʔala; and to make a strong case that these pragmatic functions motivate cognitive interpretation. The paper, which initially examines distinct interpretations of Qurʔānic saʔala that ensue from a contextual analysis of its occurrences, reveals these pragmatic functions: ṭalab "request," ʔistifsār "enquiry," muħāsaba "interrogation," ʔistifzāz "aggravation," ʔiṭmiʔnān "concern about well-being," tawbīx "reproach," tabkīt "rebuke," taqrīr "attestation" and duʕāʔ "prayer." Based on this pragmatic and other related syntactic evidence, it argues that "ask" cognitively frames, not two, but three central types of cognitively-based construal: information-seeking "ask," performative "ask" and interrogating "ask." The paper proposes some conceptual structures trigger some various utilizations of Qurʔānic "ask;" and argues that they all interlink into one schematic network that enables readers, translators and interpreters of the Holy Qurʔān to account, in a natural manner, for the verb's execution of these pragmatic functions. Finally, the findings and their theoretical implications are outlined. Keywords : Arabic linguistics, cognitive semantics, linguistic pragmatics & Qurʔānic interpretation & translation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信