新自由主义大学的音乐杂食

David K. Blake
{"title":"新自由主义大学的音乐杂食","authors":"David K. Blake","doi":"10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay attributes the rise of inclusive values in recent musicological work to multicultural and neoliberal reforms in American universities. Musicological inclusivity is characterized through omnivore theory, a sociological theory of taste correlating educational attainment with a disposition for multicultural appreciation and a rejection of highbrow modes of exclusion. Analyzing discursive values using a corpus of 120 books published between 2010 and 2013, this essay elucidates three foundational values to musicology’s inclusiveness: an interest in studying diverse music; a predilection for inter- or transdisciplinary methodologies; and the rejection of musicology itself as outdated and hegemonic. The first two of these, derived from the multicultural turn in the humanities, offer fruitful ways for musicologists to interact with the diverse cultural and technological environs of contemporary academia. The third, however, reaffirms the neoliberal devaluation of organizations and specializations, casting musicology as a straw man that bears scant resemblance to the intellectual work currently undertaken within the discipline. In order to contest the neoliberal values that threaten the discipline’s institutional foundations, this essay contends that scholars should reframe musicology as an inclusive, democratic, and specialized intellectual community, a characterization that reflects recent scholarship more accurately than highbrow stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":413730,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Musicology","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Musicological Omnivory in the Neoliberal University\",\"authors\":\"David K. Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay attributes the rise of inclusive values in recent musicological work to multicultural and neoliberal reforms in American universities. Musicological inclusivity is characterized through omnivore theory, a sociological theory of taste correlating educational attainment with a disposition for multicultural appreciation and a rejection of highbrow modes of exclusion. Analyzing discursive values using a corpus of 120 books published between 2010 and 2013, this essay elucidates three foundational values to musicology’s inclusiveness: an interest in studying diverse music; a predilection for inter- or transdisciplinary methodologies; and the rejection of musicology itself as outdated and hegemonic. The first two of these, derived from the multicultural turn in the humanities, offer fruitful ways for musicologists to interact with the diverse cultural and technological environs of contemporary academia. The third, however, reaffirms the neoliberal devaluation of organizations and specializations, casting musicology as a straw man that bears scant resemblance to the intellectual work currently undertaken within the discipline. In order to contest the neoliberal values that threaten the discipline’s institutional foundations, this essay contends that scholars should reframe musicology as an inclusive, democratic, and specialized intellectual community, a characterization that reflects recent scholarship more accurately than highbrow stereotypes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Musicology\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Musicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2017.34.3.319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文将近年来音乐学研究中包容性价值观的兴起归因于美国大学的多元文化和新自由主义改革。音乐包容性的特点是杂食理论,这是一种将教育程度与多元文化欣赏倾向和拒绝高雅排斥模式联系起来的社会学理论。本文分析了2010年至2013年间出版的120本书的话语价值,阐明了音乐学包容性的三个基本价值:对研究多样化音乐的兴趣;偏爱跨学科或跨学科的方法;以及对音乐学本身过时和霸权的拒绝。前两者源于人文学科的多元文化转向,为音乐学家与当代学术界多样化的文化和技术环境互动提供了富有成效的途径。然而,第三种观点重申了新自由主义对组织和专业的贬低,将音乐学视为一个稻草人,与目前在该学科内进行的智力工作几乎没有相似之处。为了挑战威胁该学科制度基础的新自由主义价值观,本文认为学者们应该将音乐学重新定义为一个包容、民主和专业的知识分子社区,这一特征比高雅的刻板印象更准确地反映了最近的学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Musicological Omnivory in the Neoliberal University
This essay attributes the rise of inclusive values in recent musicological work to multicultural and neoliberal reforms in American universities. Musicological inclusivity is characterized through omnivore theory, a sociological theory of taste correlating educational attainment with a disposition for multicultural appreciation and a rejection of highbrow modes of exclusion. Analyzing discursive values using a corpus of 120 books published between 2010 and 2013, this essay elucidates three foundational values to musicology’s inclusiveness: an interest in studying diverse music; a predilection for inter- or transdisciplinary methodologies; and the rejection of musicology itself as outdated and hegemonic. The first two of these, derived from the multicultural turn in the humanities, offer fruitful ways for musicologists to interact with the diverse cultural and technological environs of contemporary academia. The third, however, reaffirms the neoliberal devaluation of organizations and specializations, casting musicology as a straw man that bears scant resemblance to the intellectual work currently undertaken within the discipline. In order to contest the neoliberal values that threaten the discipline’s institutional foundations, this essay contends that scholars should reframe musicology as an inclusive, democratic, and specialized intellectual community, a characterization that reflects recent scholarship more accurately than highbrow stereotypes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信