大学生对大学教师有效沟通与无效沟通的认知

Michael W. Kramer, P. Pier
{"title":"大学生对大学教师有效沟通与无效沟通的认知","authors":"Michael W. Kramer, P. Pier","doi":"10.1080/10417949909373153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used Q‐methodology to solicit students’ descriptions of specific teachers they perceived as effective and ineffective in small and large classes. Results revealed (a) that students perceived different types of effective and ineffective teachers rather than one type and (b) that there were few differences between teachers of small and large classes. Overall, the findings suggest that the combination of behaviors, including the presence of various positive behaviors and the absence of other negative behaviors, appears more important in determining teacher effectiveness than any individual behaviors.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers\",\"authors\":\"Michael W. Kramer, P. Pier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417949909373153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study used Q‐methodology to solicit students’ descriptions of specific teachers they perceived as effective and ineffective in small and large classes. Results revealed (a) that students perceived different types of effective and ineffective teachers rather than one type and (b) that there were few differences between teachers of small and large classes. Overall, the findings suggest that the combination of behaviors, including the presence of various positive behaviors and the absence of other negative behaviors, appears more important in determining teacher effectiveness than any individual behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949909373153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949909373153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

本研究使用Q -方法论来征求学生对他们认为在小班和大班中有效和无效的特定教师的描述。结果显示:(a)学生感知到不同类型的有效和无效教师,而不是一种类型;(b)小班和大班教师之间差异不大。总的来说,研究结果表明,行为的组合,包括各种积极行为的存在和其他消极行为的缺失,在决定教师的有效性方面似乎比任何个人行为都更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers
This study used Q‐methodology to solicit students’ descriptions of specific teachers they perceived as effective and ineffective in small and large classes. Results revealed (a) that students perceived different types of effective and ineffective teachers rather than one type and (b) that there were few differences between teachers of small and large classes. Overall, the findings suggest that the combination of behaviors, including the presence of various positive behaviors and the absence of other negative behaviors, appears more important in determining teacher effectiveness than any individual behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信