etf会让股市更容易受到系统性流动性冲击吗?——来自新兴亚洲的证据

G. Wu
{"title":"etf会让股市更容易受到系统性流动性冲击吗?——来自新兴亚洲的证据","authors":"G. Wu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3796791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a dataset on ETFs ownership of stocks in nine Emerging Asian markets, we find that stocks with a higher ETF ownership exhibit a greater commonality in liquidity to other stocks in the same market. The effect increases with the level of ETFs arbitrage activities, supporting the hypothesis that ETFs arbitrage mechanism is the source of commonality in liquidity. We also find that the effect is asymmetric; ETFs exert a stronger influence when stocks’ liquidity decline. These findings are supported by a cross-market analysis, as we show that the effect is larger in market where stocks have more common exposures to ETFs, while tightened capital market condition could also amplify the effect of ETF ownership. Increased financial market openness, on the other hand, may ease the potential systemic impact. ETFs ownership of stocks also increases the commonality in liquidity of stocks across markets. The cross-markets impacts by ETFs present a channel via which financial market integration through ETFs could lead to a build-up of systemic liquidity risks and increase the vulnerability of liquidity shock spill-over to stock markets.","PeriodicalId":287077,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could Etfs Make Stock Markets More Vulnerable to Systemic Liquidity Shock? – Evidence From Emerging Asia\",\"authors\":\"G. Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3796791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a dataset on ETFs ownership of stocks in nine Emerging Asian markets, we find that stocks with a higher ETF ownership exhibit a greater commonality in liquidity to other stocks in the same market. The effect increases with the level of ETFs arbitrage activities, supporting the hypothesis that ETFs arbitrage mechanism is the source of commonality in liquidity. We also find that the effect is asymmetric; ETFs exert a stronger influence when stocks’ liquidity decline. These findings are supported by a cross-market analysis, as we show that the effect is larger in market where stocks have more common exposures to ETFs, while tightened capital market condition could also amplify the effect of ETF ownership. Increased financial market openness, on the other hand, may ease the potential systemic impact. ETFs ownership of stocks also increases the commonality in liquidity of stocks across markets. The cross-markets impacts by ETFs present a channel via which financial market integration through ETFs could lead to a build-up of systemic liquidity risks and increase the vulnerability of liquidity shock spill-over to stock markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3796791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3796791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用九个亚洲新兴市场的ETF持股数据集,我们发现ETF持股比例较高的股票与同一市场的其他股票在流动性方面表现出更大的共性。该效应随着etf套利活动水平的增加而增加,支持etf套利机制是流动性共性来源的假设。我们还发现这种效应是不对称的;当股票流动性下降时,etf的影响更大。这些发现得到了跨市场分析的支持,因为我们表明,在股票对ETF的风险敞口较多的市场中,这种影响更大,而资本市场条件收紧也会放大ETF所有权的影响。另一方面,增加金融市场的开放可能会缓解潜在的系统性影响。etf持有股票也增加了股票在各个市场流动性的共性。etf的跨市场影响提供了一个渠道,通过etf进行金融市场整合可能导致系统性流动性风险的积累,并增加流动性冲击溢出到股市的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Could Etfs Make Stock Markets More Vulnerable to Systemic Liquidity Shock? – Evidence From Emerging Asia
Using a dataset on ETFs ownership of stocks in nine Emerging Asian markets, we find that stocks with a higher ETF ownership exhibit a greater commonality in liquidity to other stocks in the same market. The effect increases with the level of ETFs arbitrage activities, supporting the hypothesis that ETFs arbitrage mechanism is the source of commonality in liquidity. We also find that the effect is asymmetric; ETFs exert a stronger influence when stocks’ liquidity decline. These findings are supported by a cross-market analysis, as we show that the effect is larger in market where stocks have more common exposures to ETFs, while tightened capital market condition could also amplify the effect of ETF ownership. Increased financial market openness, on the other hand, may ease the potential systemic impact. ETFs ownership of stocks also increases the commonality in liquidity of stocks across markets. The cross-markets impacts by ETFs present a channel via which financial market integration through ETFs could lead to a build-up of systemic liquidity risks and increase the vulnerability of liquidity shock spill-over to stock markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信