未实现的联盟

Alex Schafran
{"title":"未实现的联盟","authors":"Alex Schafran","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines why resegregation was never prevented by the state of California. It asks, why did California, the world's greatest urban project during the first three quarters of the twentieth century, decide that it no longer needed to collectively invest in its urban future? Why did it not develop a more functional system of urban and regional politics that could have dealt with the sins of the postwar era? Why could it not wean itself from an overreliance on certain forms of infrastructure without constructing an entirely new map of inequality? A common recent explanation for this inaction reaches beyond development politics to basic governance. A second set of reasons for inaction fits squarely within the focus on neoliberalism and Reaganite revanchism.","PeriodicalId":115844,"journal":{"name":"The Road to Resegregation","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Unrealized Coalition\",\"authors\":\"Alex Schafran\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines why resegregation was never prevented by the state of California. It asks, why did California, the world's greatest urban project during the first three quarters of the twentieth century, decide that it no longer needed to collectively invest in its urban future? Why did it not develop a more functional system of urban and regional politics that could have dealt with the sins of the postwar era? Why could it not wean itself from an overreliance on certain forms of infrastructure without constructing an entirely new map of inequality? A common recent explanation for this inaction reaches beyond development politics to basic governance. A second set of reasons for inaction fits squarely within the focus on neoliberalism and Reaganite revanchism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Road to Resegregation\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Road to Resegregation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Road to Resegregation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65svzf.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章探讨了为什么加州从未阻止重新种族隔离。它问,为什么加州,这个在20世纪前四分之三的世界上最伟大的城市项目,决定不再需要集体投资城市的未来?为什么它没有发展出一个功能更强大的城市和地区政治体系,以应对战后时代的罪恶?为什么它不能摆脱对某些形式的基础设施的过度依赖,而不构建一个全新的不平等地图?最近对这种不作为的常见解释超越了发展政治,延伸到了基本治理。不作为的第二个原因正好符合对新自由主义和里根复仇主义的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Unrealized Coalition
This chapter examines why resegregation was never prevented by the state of California. It asks, why did California, the world's greatest urban project during the first three quarters of the twentieth century, decide that it no longer needed to collectively invest in its urban future? Why did it not develop a more functional system of urban and regional politics that could have dealt with the sins of the postwar era? Why could it not wean itself from an overreliance on certain forms of infrastructure without constructing an entirely new map of inequality? A common recent explanation for this inaction reaches beyond development politics to basic governance. A second set of reasons for inaction fits squarely within the focus on neoliberalism and Reaganite revanchism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信