陆上和海上风电场叶片制造:巴西能源和环境绩效案例研究

Mário Joel Ramos Júnior, D. L. Medeiros, E. S. Almeida
{"title":"陆上和海上风电场叶片制造:巴西能源和环境绩效案例研究","authors":"Mário Joel Ramos Júnior, D. L. Medeiros, E. S. Almeida","doi":"10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e12122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to analyze the energy and environmental performance of the manufacture of two models of wind turbine blades for a 300 MW wind farm. Material flow analysis (MFA) was used to prepare the mass balance, while life cycle assessment (LCA), based on ISO-14044, was used to evaluate three impact categories, considering sensitivity analysis to evaluate the replacement of wind turbine blade materials. Results showed that the manufacturing of wind turbine blades causes a 10% loss of material impregnated with fiberglass and epoxy resin. Fiberglass was the input with the highest contribution to water consumption, energy consumption, and the carbon footprint. The sensitivity analysis showed that, for the offshore scenario of higher capacity factor and longer lifetime, the carbon footprint contribution per electricity to be produced was 0.214 kg CO2eq/GJ, while for the onshore scenario of lower capacity factor and shorter lifetime, it was 1.37 kg CO2eq/GJ. When using jute fiber grown without irrigation as a substitute input for fiberglass, the reduction was 38% (onshore) and 42% (offshore) in water consumption, 18% (onshore and offshore) in energy consumption, and 24% (onshore) and 25% (offshore) in carbon footprint. The onshore model had a larger impact in all the categories evaluated than the offshore model. Therefore, the use of unirrigated jute fiber allows gains in energy and environmental performance.","PeriodicalId":146264,"journal":{"name":"Gestão & Produção","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blade manufacturing for onshore and offshore wind farms: the energy and environmental performance for a case study in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Mário Joel Ramos Júnior, D. L. Medeiros, E. S. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e12122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study aims to analyze the energy and environmental performance of the manufacture of two models of wind turbine blades for a 300 MW wind farm. Material flow analysis (MFA) was used to prepare the mass balance, while life cycle assessment (LCA), based on ISO-14044, was used to evaluate three impact categories, considering sensitivity analysis to evaluate the replacement of wind turbine blade materials. Results showed that the manufacturing of wind turbine blades causes a 10% loss of material impregnated with fiberglass and epoxy resin. Fiberglass was the input with the highest contribution to water consumption, energy consumption, and the carbon footprint. The sensitivity analysis showed that, for the offshore scenario of higher capacity factor and longer lifetime, the carbon footprint contribution per electricity to be produced was 0.214 kg CO2eq/GJ, while for the onshore scenario of lower capacity factor and shorter lifetime, it was 1.37 kg CO2eq/GJ. When using jute fiber grown without irrigation as a substitute input for fiberglass, the reduction was 38% (onshore) and 42% (offshore) in water consumption, 18% (onshore and offshore) in energy consumption, and 24% (onshore) and 25% (offshore) in carbon footprint. The onshore model had a larger impact in all the categories evaluated than the offshore model. Therefore, the use of unirrigated jute fiber allows gains in energy and environmental performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestão & Produção\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestão & Produção\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e12122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestão & Produção","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e12122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在分析某300mw风电场两种型号风机叶片的能源和环境性能。采用物料流分析(MFA)编制质量平衡,采用基于ISO-14044的生命周期评估(LCA)对三种影响类别进行评估,并考虑敏感性分析对风机叶片材料的更换进行评估。结果表明,在风力涡轮机叶片的制造过程中,玻璃纤维和环氧树脂浸渍材料的损耗为10%。玻璃纤维是对水消耗、能源消耗和碳足迹贡献最大的投入。敏感性分析表明,对于容量因子较高、寿命较长的海上发电情景,每电碳足迹贡献为0.214 kg CO2eq/GJ,而对于容量因子较低、寿命较短的陆上发电情景,每电碳足迹贡献为1.37 kg CO2eq/GJ。当使用未经灌溉的黄麻纤维作为玻璃纤维的替代品时,用水量减少38%(陆上)和42%(海上),能源消耗减少18%(陆上和海上),碳足迹减少24%(陆上)和25%(海上)。陆上模型在所有评估类别中都比海上模型有更大的影响。因此,使用未经灌溉的黄麻纤维可以获得能源和环境性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blade manufacturing for onshore and offshore wind farms: the energy and environmental performance for a case study in Brazil
Abstract This study aims to analyze the energy and environmental performance of the manufacture of two models of wind turbine blades for a 300 MW wind farm. Material flow analysis (MFA) was used to prepare the mass balance, while life cycle assessment (LCA), based on ISO-14044, was used to evaluate three impact categories, considering sensitivity analysis to evaluate the replacement of wind turbine blade materials. Results showed that the manufacturing of wind turbine blades causes a 10% loss of material impregnated with fiberglass and epoxy resin. Fiberglass was the input with the highest contribution to water consumption, energy consumption, and the carbon footprint. The sensitivity analysis showed that, for the offshore scenario of higher capacity factor and longer lifetime, the carbon footprint contribution per electricity to be produced was 0.214 kg CO2eq/GJ, while for the onshore scenario of lower capacity factor and shorter lifetime, it was 1.37 kg CO2eq/GJ. When using jute fiber grown without irrigation as a substitute input for fiberglass, the reduction was 38% (onshore) and 42% (offshore) in water consumption, 18% (onshore and offshore) in energy consumption, and 24% (onshore) and 25% (offshore) in carbon footprint. The onshore model had a larger impact in all the categories evaluated than the offshore model. Therefore, the use of unirrigated jute fiber allows gains in energy and environmental performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信