{"title":"内镜干预患者不同氧流量下中度镇静期间心肺参数监测","authors":"Josef Zekry Attia, Abeer A.M. Hassanin","doi":"10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiorespiratory parameters before, during and after administration of sedation/analgesia in patients undergone endoscopic procedure should have monitored. Aim of the study: In this study we evaluated the effect of different O2 flow rates on the non-invasive CO2 monitoring (EtCO2) in patients that are breathing spontaneously under moderate sedation undergoing endoscopic procedures. Methods: 120 patients of both sexes aged between 25 and 60 years with ASA- I and II scheduled for undergoing upper GIT endoscopy for gastric ulcer patients. Patients were randomized to three equal groups. Group I: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate of 2 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Group II: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate 4 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Group III: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate 6 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Results: EtCO2 differences between the three studied groups were statistically significant at preoperative, induction, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min but with no any clinical significance or adverse outcome. HR, MBP, RR and Spo2 difference between group were statistically insignificant throughout the procedure with no serious complications were recorded and patients satisfaction results were comparable between the three studied groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that different O2 flow rates did not affect noninvasive EtCO2 measurement during moderate sedation in patients undergoing upper GIT endoscopy for gastric ulcer patients.","PeriodicalId":228896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiorespiratory parameters monitoring during moderate sedation at different oxygen flow rates in patients undergoing endoscopic intervention\",\"authors\":\"Josef Zekry Attia, Abeer A.M. Hassanin\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cardiorespiratory parameters before, during and after administration of sedation/analgesia in patients undergone endoscopic procedure should have monitored. Aim of the study: In this study we evaluated the effect of different O2 flow rates on the non-invasive CO2 monitoring (EtCO2) in patients that are breathing spontaneously under moderate sedation undergoing endoscopic procedures. Methods: 120 patients of both sexes aged between 25 and 60 years with ASA- I and II scheduled for undergoing upper GIT endoscopy for gastric ulcer patients. Patients were randomized to three equal groups. Group I: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate of 2 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Group II: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate 4 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Group III: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate 6 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Results: EtCO2 differences between the three studied groups were statistically significant at preoperative, induction, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min but with no any clinical significance or adverse outcome. HR, MBP, RR and Spo2 difference between group were statistically insignificant throughout the procedure with no serious complications were recorded and patients satisfaction results were comparable between the three studied groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that different O2 flow rates did not affect noninvasive EtCO2 measurement during moderate sedation in patients undergoing upper GIT endoscopy for gastric ulcer patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:内窥镜手术患者在镇静/镇痛之前、期间和之后的心肺参数应该进行监测。研究目的:在本研究中,我们评估了不同的氧气流速对内镜下中度镇静下自主呼吸的患者无创二氧化碳监测(EtCO2)的影响。方法:120例年龄25 ~ 60岁,ASA- I和II型的胃溃疡患者行胃脘胃镜检查。患者被随机分为三组。第一组:40例患者以每分钟2升的速度供氧,然后在整个过程中记录心电图和其他措施。第二组:40例患者以每分钟4升的速度供氧,然后在整个过程中记录心电图和其他措施。第三组:40例患者以每分钟6升的速度供氧,然后在整个过程中记录心电图和其他措施。结果:三组患者术前、诱导、5、10、20、30 min EtCO2差异均有统计学意义,但无临床意义及不良结局。两组间HR、MBP、RR、Spo2差异均无统计学意义,无严重并发症发生,三组间患者满意度具有可比性。结论:我们的研究表明,在胃溃疡患者接受上消化道内镜检查时,不同的O2流速对中度镇静期间无创EtCO2测量没有影响。
Cardiorespiratory parameters monitoring during moderate sedation at different oxygen flow rates in patients undergoing endoscopic intervention
Background: Cardiorespiratory parameters before, during and after administration of sedation/analgesia in patients undergone endoscopic procedure should have monitored. Aim of the study: In this study we evaluated the effect of different O2 flow rates on the non-invasive CO2 monitoring (EtCO2) in patients that are breathing spontaneously under moderate sedation undergoing endoscopic procedures. Methods: 120 patients of both sexes aged between 25 and 60 years with ASA- I and II scheduled for undergoing upper GIT endoscopy for gastric ulcer patients. Patients were randomized to three equal groups. Group I: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate of 2 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Group II: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate 4 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Group III: 40 patients will receive O2 supply at rate 6 liters per minute and then cabnographic and other measures will be recorded throughout the procedure. Results: EtCO2 differences between the three studied groups were statistically significant at preoperative, induction, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min but with no any clinical significance or adverse outcome. HR, MBP, RR and Spo2 difference between group were statistically insignificant throughout the procedure with no serious complications were recorded and patients satisfaction results were comparable between the three studied groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that different O2 flow rates did not affect noninvasive EtCO2 measurement during moderate sedation in patients undergoing upper GIT endoscopy for gastric ulcer patients.