成人慢性疾病患者对补充药物和药物量表(臂)依从性的心理测量学评估:黎巴嫩版

Mohamad Ismail, Mayssah El-Nayal, P. Salameh, Souraya Domiati
{"title":"成人慢性疾病患者对补充药物和药物量表(臂)依从性的心理测量学评估:黎巴嫩版","authors":"Mohamad Ismail, Mayssah El-Nayal, P. Salameh, Souraya Domiati","doi":"10.54729/dvol1609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-adherence to medications can lead to several consequences that range from waste of drugs to death. Consequently, a tool to assess the adherence to chronic medication is a necessity. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct the translation and cross-cultural adaptation process of ARMS into the Lebanese Arabic version (ARMS-A) and to examine its psychometric properties (validity and reliability assessment). Design: The original English version of ARMS was translated into Arabic based on the established guidelines. Eight expert panels were involved in content validation, while face validation was conducted on twenty participants during pilot testing. A cross-sectional survey was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of ARMS-A on 135 participants. Participants: Adults patients on chronic medications were invited to be part of the study. Main outcome measures: Overall content and universal face validity indexes were determined in addition to the exploratory factors and Cronbach’s alpha. Key Results: The overall content validity index was 0.91, and the universal face validity index was also 0.91. For the exploratory factor analysis, two factors were extracted. The first one consisted of 6 items and explained 43.9% of the variance. The second one also comprised of 6 items with a variance of 9.59%. For internal consistency and reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.877. Conclusion: ARMS-A appears to be a valid and reliable medication adherence tool to assess the adherence of chronic medications among native Arabic speaking patient with chronic diseases.","PeriodicalId":143734,"journal":{"name":"BAU Journal - Society, Culture and Human Behavior","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE ADHERENCE TO REFILLS AND MEDICATIONS SCALE (ARMS) AMONG ADULTS PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DISEASE: THE LEBANESE VERSION\",\"authors\":\"Mohamad Ismail, Mayssah El-Nayal, P. Salameh, Souraya Domiati\",\"doi\":\"10.54729/dvol1609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-adherence to medications can lead to several consequences that range from waste of drugs to death. Consequently, a tool to assess the adherence to chronic medication is a necessity. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct the translation and cross-cultural adaptation process of ARMS into the Lebanese Arabic version (ARMS-A) and to examine its psychometric properties (validity and reliability assessment). Design: The original English version of ARMS was translated into Arabic based on the established guidelines. Eight expert panels were involved in content validation, while face validation was conducted on twenty participants during pilot testing. A cross-sectional survey was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of ARMS-A on 135 participants. Participants: Adults patients on chronic medications were invited to be part of the study. Main outcome measures: Overall content and universal face validity indexes were determined in addition to the exploratory factors and Cronbach’s alpha. Key Results: The overall content validity index was 0.91, and the universal face validity index was also 0.91. For the exploratory factor analysis, two factors were extracted. The first one consisted of 6 items and explained 43.9% of the variance. The second one also comprised of 6 items with a variance of 9.59%. For internal consistency and reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.877. Conclusion: ARMS-A appears to be a valid and reliable medication adherence tool to assess the adherence of chronic medications among native Arabic speaking patient with chronic diseases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BAU Journal - Society, Culture and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BAU Journal - Society, Culture and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54729/dvol1609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAU Journal - Society, Culture and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54729/dvol1609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不坚持服药可能导致多种后果,从浪费药物到死亡。因此,一种评估慢性药物依从性的工具是必要的。目的:本研究的目的是进行ARMS翻译成黎巴嫩阿拉伯语版本(ARMS- a)的翻译和跨文化适应过程,并检验其心理测量学特性(效度和信度评估)。设计:ARMS的原始英文版本根据既定的指导原则翻译成阿拉伯语。内容验证涉及8个专家小组,而在试点测试中对20名参与者进行了面部验证。采用横断面调查法对135名被试进行了ARMS-A量表的心理测量特性评估。参与者:接受慢性药物治疗的成年患者被邀请参与研究。主要结果测量:除探索性因素和Cronbach’s alpha外,还测定了总体内容和通用面孔效度指标。关键结果:整体内容效度指数为0.91,普遍面孔效度指数为0.91。为了进行探索性因子分析,提取了两个因子。第一个由6个项目组成,解释了43.9%的方差。第二项也有6项,方差为9.59%。对于内部一致性和信度,Cronbach 's alpha为0.877。结论:ARMS-A似乎是一种有效和可靠的药物依从性工具,用于评估母语为阿拉伯语的慢性病患者的慢性药物依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE ADHERENCE TO REFILLS AND MEDICATIONS SCALE (ARMS) AMONG ADULTS PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DISEASE: THE LEBANESE VERSION
Non-adherence to medications can lead to several consequences that range from waste of drugs to death. Consequently, a tool to assess the adherence to chronic medication is a necessity. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct the translation and cross-cultural adaptation process of ARMS into the Lebanese Arabic version (ARMS-A) and to examine its psychometric properties (validity and reliability assessment). Design: The original English version of ARMS was translated into Arabic based on the established guidelines. Eight expert panels were involved in content validation, while face validation was conducted on twenty participants during pilot testing. A cross-sectional survey was used to evaluate the psychometric properties of ARMS-A on 135 participants. Participants: Adults patients on chronic medications were invited to be part of the study. Main outcome measures: Overall content and universal face validity indexes were determined in addition to the exploratory factors and Cronbach’s alpha. Key Results: The overall content validity index was 0.91, and the universal face validity index was also 0.91. For the exploratory factor analysis, two factors were extracted. The first one consisted of 6 items and explained 43.9% of the variance. The second one also comprised of 6 items with a variance of 9.59%. For internal consistency and reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.877. Conclusion: ARMS-A appears to be a valid and reliable medication adherence tool to assess the adherence of chronic medications among native Arabic speaking patient with chronic diseases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信